Distinctive features of "chronotherapeutic" and "pulsatile" drug delivery systems negating the practice of their interchangeable terminology

Abstract

The term pulsatile drug delivery has often been used as a synonym to chronotherapeutic drug delivery. This needs to be given a thought as both the drug delivery systems are entirely addressing different needs of the patients as well as the intentions of the formulators being different. Chronotherapeutic systems are based completely on circadian needs and response of the body and the need of the drug to be in its maximum concentrations at a particular time of the day, the fact being supported by endless list of ailments which elicit the related symptoms at a particular time of the day. Considering the formulation approach, one does not find major differences among site-specific chronotherapeutic systems and the basic and more conventional intestinal or colon targeted systems due to the mechanism and the site of landing of drug of both being almost similar even though the intention of the formulator being different. An ideal pulsatile system is the one delivering drug in different pulses with multiple troughs in release profile. The article explores the major differences in between the two systems and highlights the need of using appropriate terminology for these individual and distinct systems catering different needs.