Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Feb;60(571):56-63.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483157.

Outcome of knee injuries in general practice: 1-year follow-up

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Outcome of knee injuries in general practice: 1-year follow-up

Harry P A Wagemakers et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Knee injuries may lead to pain and to functional limitations in the activities of daily living. Patients with knee injuries are frequently seen in general practice; however, the outcome and management in these patients is not known.

Aim: To assess the outcome and management of knee injuries at 12 months' follow-up in general practice.

Design of study: A prospective observational cohort study with a 1-year follow-up.

Setting: Primary health care.

Method: Adult patients consulting their GP after knee injury (n = 134) participated in the cohort. A magnetic resonance imaging scan was carried out and patients were diagnosed as either no lesion or an isolated meniscal tear, an isolated collateral or cruciate ligament lesion, or a combination. Follow-up questionnaires were filled in up to 12 months' follow-up.

Results: At 12 months' follow-up, 34 patients reported full recovery and 67 patients reported major improvement. At baseline, 37 patients (28%) were referred to physical therapy and 17 patients (13%) were referred to secondary care. During 1 year of follow-up, another 21 referrals to physical therapy and 11 referrals to secondary care took place. The pain severity decreased the most, and the Lysholm knee score increased in the majority of patients during the first 3 months after injury. In total, 18 arthroscopies were performed in 15 patients. One patient underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Conclusion: The vast majority of patients report clinically relevant recovery. There is no clear difference in outcomes between patients with meniscal tears or ligament lesions and patients without these diagnoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of eligible patients
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pain score (NRS) for the various isolated and combination lesions
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lysholm score for the various isolated and combination lesions

Comment in

References

    1. Linden MW, van der WG, Bakker DH de, Schellevis FG. Tweede nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk: klachten en aandoeningen in de bevolking en in de huisartspraktijk. Utrecht, Bilthoven: Nivel, Rijksinstituut voor volksgezondheid en milieu; 2004. [Second national study on diseases and consultations in general practice]
    1. Calmbach WL, Hutchens M. Evaluation of patients presenting with knee paPart I. History, physical examination, radiographs, and laboratory tests. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(5):907–912. - PubMed
    1. Kostogiannis I, Ageberg E, Neuman P, et al. Activity level and subjective knee function 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective, longitudinal study of nonreconstructed patients. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1135–1143. - PubMed
    1. Swirtun LR, Renstrom P. Factors affecting outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study with a six-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(3):318–324. - PubMed
    1. Gillquist J, Messner K. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the long-term incidence of gonarthrosis. Sports Med. 1999;27(3):143–156. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms