Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients. The ENDORSE Global Survey
- PMID: 20135072
- DOI: 10.1160/TH09-09-0667
Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients. The ENDORSE Global Survey
Abstract
Limited data are available regarding the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE prophylaxis use in hospitalised medically ill patients. We analysed data from the global ENDORSE survey to evaluate VTE risk and prophylaxis use in this population according to diagnosis, baseline characteristics, and country. Data on patient characteristics, VTE risk, and prophylaxis use were abstracted from hospital charts. VTE risk and prophylaxis use were evaluated according to the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Data were evaluated for 37,356 hospitalised medical patients across 32 countries. VTE risk varied according to medical diagnosis, from 31.2% of patients with gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary diseases to 100% of patients with acute heart failure, active non-infectious respiratory disease, or pulmonary infection (global rate, 41.5%). Among those at risk for VTE, ACCP-recommended prophylaxis was used in 24.4% haemorrhagic stroke patients and 40-45% of cardiopulmonary disease patients (global rate, 39.5%). Large differences in prophylaxis use were observed among countries. Markers of disease severity, including central venous catheters, mechanical ventilation, and admission to intensive care units, were strongly associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. In conclusion, VTE risk varies according to medical diagnosis. Less than 40% of at-risk hospitalised medical patients receive ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Prophylaxis use appears to be associated with disease severity rather than medical diagnosis. These data support the necessity to improve implementation of available guidelines for evaluating VTE risk and providing prophylaxis to hospitalised medical patients.
Similar articles
-
A retrospective review of the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients who subsequently developed a venous thromboembolism after discharge from hospital.N Z Med J. 2010 Feb 19;123(1309):37-49. N Z Med J. 2010. PMID: 20186241
-
A cross-sectional evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk and use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients in Senegal.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Oct;104(10):493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Sep 1. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011. PMID: 22044701
-
Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute care hospital setting (ENDORSE survey): findings in surgical patients.Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):330-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e58f. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 20054273
-
Disease burden and unmet needs for prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients in Europe show underutilisation of preventive therapies.Thromb Haemost. 2011 Oct;106(4):600-8. doi: 10.1160/TH11-03-0168. Epub 2011 Aug 11. Thromb Haemost. 2011. PMID: 21833448 Review.
-
Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients: a clinical update.Postgrad Med J. 2006 Dec;82(974):806-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.044107. Postgrad Med J. 2006. PMID: 17148703 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk following hospitalization.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011 Jul;32(1):32-9. doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0542-9. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011. PMID: 21193946 Clinical Trial.
-
Venous thromboembolism risk & prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE), a multinational cross-sectional study: results from the Indian subset data.Indian J Med Res. 2012 Jul;136(1):60-7. Indian J Med Res. 2012. PMID: 22885265 Free PMC article.
-
Graduated compression stockings in prevention of venous thromboembolism among acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years: a French national survey.Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Jun 25;14:1153-1157. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S197603. eCollection 2019. Clin Interv Aging. 2019. PMID: 31417245 Free PMC article.
-
Is guideline-driven prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism common practice in the South African private hospital setting?S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2020 Oct 12;62(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/safp.v62i1.5022. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2020. PMID: 33054253 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of thromboembolism and thromboprophylaxis in medical patients admitted to specialized hospital in Ethiopia using Padua prediction score.SAGE Open Med. 2022 Feb 21;10:20503121221079488. doi: 10.1177/20503121221079488. eCollection 2022. SAGE Open Med. 2022. PMID: 35223033 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources