Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases
- PMID: 20135180
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0856-x
Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases
Abstract
Background: An important aspect of a new surgical technique is whether it can be performed by other surgeons in other institutions. The authors report the first 297 cases in a multi-institutional and multinational review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed via a single portal of entry.
Methods: Data were collected retrospectively for the initial patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy by 13 surgeons who performed these procedures in their institutions after training by the authors. The review included operative time, blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay (LOS), necessary additional trocars, and other parameters important to cholecystectomy. A database of all the single-port-access (SPA) surgeries performed by the surgeons included demographic and procedural details, LOS, complications, and initial follow-up data.
Results: To date, 297 single-port cholecystectomies have been performed for a variety of diagnoses, primarily cholelithiasis. The average operative time was 71 min, and the average LOS was 1-2 days. The average blood loss was minimal. The use of additional port sites outside the umbilicus occurred in 34 of the cases. Of the 35 intraoperative cholangiograms performed, 34 were successful. No significant complications occurred except for seromas and minor postoperative wound infections. These results are comparable with those for standard multiport cholecystectomy. In addition, no access site hernias (ASH) occurred.
Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that SPA surgery is an alternative to multiport laparoscopy with fewer scars and better cosmesis. One factor affecting the rate for adoption of SPA surgery among other surgeons is the reproducibility of this new procedure. Although this study had insufficient data to determine fully the benefits of SPA surgery, the feasibility of this procedure with safe, acceptable results was demonstrated in this initial large series across multinational institutions.
Similar articles
-
Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: two year follow-up.JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):528-35. doi: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404245. JSLS. 2009. PMID: 20202394 Free PMC article.
-
[Single-port access cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison of single-port access versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy].Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Feb;138(1):70-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283886. Epub 2012 Mar 16. Zentralbl Chir. 2013. PMID: 22426970 German.
-
Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients.World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):991-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1946-4. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23435700 Clinical Trial.
-
Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19(2):219-22. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0275. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009. PMID: 19260790
-
Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review.Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4716-4727. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6300-3. Epub 2018 Jun 25. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29943057
Cited by
-
Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy: The Timeline of Progress.World J Surg. 2015 Oct;39(10):2386-91. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3135-0. World J Surg. 2015. PMID: 26133910
-
Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiogram.Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1683-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1408-0. Epub 2010 Oct 29. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21046159
-
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery - current status and controversies.J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Jan;7(1):6-16. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72360. J Minim Access Surg. 2011. PMID: 21197236 Free PMC article.
-
Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy.World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4. World J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24081531
-
A retrospective wound review of standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there need for single-port laparoscopic surgery?Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):255-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1863-2. Epub 2011 Aug 20. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 21858572
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous