Subcutaneous cod liver oil injection for penile augmentation: review of literature and report of eight cases
- PMID: 20138344
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.023
Subcutaneous cod liver oil injection for penile augmentation: review of literature and report of eight cases
Abstract
Objectives: To study the presentations and treatment outcome of 8 consecutive patients for whom cod liver oil was injected in the subcutaneous area of their penises by a lay person for purpose of augmentation.
Methods: Various amounts of cod liver oil were injected in the subcutaneous area of the penis of 8 low socioeconomic class patients by a nonmedical person. They presented by various complications ranging from paraphimosis up to abscess formation and necrosis of penile skin. All the patients underwent emergency initial surgical intervention ranging from dorsal preputial slit to skin debridement. Definitive surgical treatment was carried out using local penile flap and V-Y plasty.
Results: The severity of complications was correlated to the amount of oil injected and the time interval between injections and presentation. All the 8 patients were cured after different staged surgical procedures. The postoperative course was uneventful in 6 patients, and 2 patients suffered from wound infection after the secondary treatment. All patients had acceptable cosmetic and functional outcome, and were satisfied regarding the length of the penis. None reported erectile dysfunction.
Conclusions: Increased public awareness is indicated to avoid this problem. Early detection and prompt treatment give acceptable anatomic and functional results.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Complications of penile augmentation by use of nonmedical industrial silicone.J Sex Med. 2012 Dec;9(12):3279-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02563.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6. J Sex Med. 2012. PMID: 22145947
-
Treatment and outcome of vaseline-induced sclerosing lipogranuloma of the penis.Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.081. Urology. 2008. PMID: 18538694
-
Subcutaneous metallic mercury injection for penile augmentation.Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):185.e3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.028. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17270654
-
Penile injection with silicone: case report and review of the literature.J Sex Med. 2008 Sep;5(9):2231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00911.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24. J Sex Med. 2008. PMID: 18657262 Review.
-
Sclerosing lipogranuloma of the penis: a narrative review of complications and treatment.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2705-2714. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-228. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34295755 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Penile enhancement procedures with simultaneous penile prosthesis placement.Adv Urol. 2012;2012:314612. doi: 10.1155/2012/314612. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Adv Urol. 2012. PMID: 22811703 Free PMC article.
-
A Case of Kanamycin Self-Injection for Penile Augmentation and a Literature Review of Penile Foreign Body Injections.Cureus. 2024 Nov 9;16(11):e73325. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73325. eCollection 2024 Nov. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39659313 Free PMC article.
-
Mineral Oil-induced Sclerosing Lipogranuloma of the Penis.J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 Sep;3(9):41-4. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20877525 Free PMC article.
-
Complications and outcomes following injection of foreign material into the male external genitalia for augmentation: a single-centre experience and systematic review.Int J Impot Res. 2024 Aug;36(5):498-508. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00675-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1. Int J Impot Res. 2024. PMID: 36859681 Free PMC article.
-
Managing Complications of Fillers: Rare and Not-So-Rare.J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):198-210. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.172191. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015. PMID: 26865784 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical