Reference values for quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents: developmental and gender differences of somatosensory perception
- PMID: 20138430
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.011
Reference values for quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents: developmental and gender differences of somatosensory perception
Abstract
The Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) protocol of the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS) encompassing all somatosensory modalities assesses the functioning of different nerve fibers and of central pathways. The aim of our study was: (1) to explore, whether this QST protocol is feasible for children, (2) to detect distribution properties of QST data and the impact of body site, age and gender and (3) to establish reference values for QST in children and adolescents. The QST protocol of the DFNS with modification of instructions and pain rating was used in 176 children aged 6.12-16.12years for six body sites. QST was feasible for children over 5years of age. ANOVAs revealed developmental, gender and body site differences of somatosensory functions similar to adults. The face was more sensitive than the hand and/or foot. Younger children (6-8years) were generally less sensitive to all thermal and mechanical detection stimuli but more sensitive to all pain stimuli than older (9-12years) children, whereas there were little differences between older children and adolescents (13-17years). Girls were more sensitive to thermal detection and pain stimuli, but not to mechanical detection and pain stimuli. Reference values differ from adults, but distribution properties (range, variance, and side differences) were similar and plausible for statistical factors. Our results demonstrate that the full QST protocol is feasible and valid for children over 5years of age with their own reference values.
Copyright 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Abad F, Az-Gomez NM, Rodriguez I, Perez R, Delgado JA. Subclinical pain and thermal sensory dysfunction in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2002;19:827.
-
- Aloisi AM. Gonadal hormones and sex differences in pain reactivity. Clin J Pain. 2003;19:168-174.
-
- Arts SE, Abu-Saad HH, Champion GD, Crawford MR, Fisher RJ, Juniper KH, Ziegler JB. Age-related response to lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) emulsion and effect of music distraction on the pain of intravenous cannulation. Pediatr. 1994;93:797-801.
-
- Cepeda MS, Carr DB. Clinical meaning of a decline in pain intensity in children and its implications in care and research. Pecliatr Pain Lett. 2008;8:23-27.
-
- Chambers CT, Craig DT, Bennett SM. The impact of maternal behavior on children's pain experiences: an experimental analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27:293-301.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
