Epidural anesthesia: views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital
- PMID: 20139548
- DOI: 10.4103/1596-3519.59580
Epidural anesthesia: views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital
Abstract
Background: Pain during childbirth is a well known cause of dissatisfaction amongst women in labor. The use of epidural analgesia in labor is becoming widespread due to its benefit in terms of pain relief.
Method: After approval of the local Ethics Committee on Research and obtaining informed written consent, 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-II consecutive multiparous women in labor requesting pain relief were enrolled in this prospective study. After providing description of the two options of pain relief available to them, they were allocated into two groups according to their request-to receive either parenteral opioid/sedative or epidural labor analgesia. Both groups received analgesia of choice at 4-cm cervical os dilatation. The epidural group received 0.125% plain bupivacaine, while the other group received pentazocine/promethazine intravenously. The time taken to locate the epidural space, catheter-related complications encountered and the amount of intravenous fluid used were documented.
Result: The two groups were comparable in terms of socio-demographic data. The mean duration of the first and second stages of labor, respectively, were significantly shorter in the epidural group when compared with those in the non-epidural group ([P < 0.01] and [P < 0.02]). There was no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery between them - epidural analgesia (32% [8/25]) versus parenteral opioid/sedative (44% [11/25]), (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.19-1.90). The maternal blood loss from delivery was minimal, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.27). The neonatal outcome was the same in both groups. Closed questionnaire showed that the overall experience of labor was much better (it was also better than expected) in the epidural group when compared with that in the non-epidural group (80% versus 4%). Eighteen (72%) women had inadequate pain relief in the non-epidural group as compared to 2 (8%) women in the epidural group.
Conclusion: The study shows that epidural labor analgesia is acceptable to women in our setting. More women in the epidural analgesia group were satisfied with the experience of labor than those who did not receive this form of analgesia than among those who received parenteral opioid/sedative.
Similar articles
-
Subarachnoid analgesia in advanced labor: a comparison of subarachnoid analgesia and pudendal block in advanced labor: analgesic quality and obstetric outcome.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Dec;1034:356-63. doi: 10.1196/annals.1335.037. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004. PMID: 15731325 Clinical Trial.
-
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women.Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):826-31. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b8. Epub 2011 Jul 25. Anesth Analg. 2011. PMID: 21788309 Clinical Trial.
-
Local anesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine.Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105(3):756-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278131.73472.f4. Anesth Analg. 2007. PMID: 17717236 Clinical Trial.
-
Focused review: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for epidural labor analgesia.Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):482-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e3a08e. Epub 2010 Jun 7. Anesth Analg. 2010. PMID: 20529986 Review.
-
Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery.N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1503-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0909254. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20410515 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Obstetric analgesia for vaginal birth in contemporary obstetrics: a survey of the practice of obstetricians in Nigeria.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 12;14:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-140. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 24725280 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of different analgesic methods used for vaginal delivery on mothers and fetuses.Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):930-936. doi: 10.3906/sag-1911-61. Turk J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32394678 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors associated with epidural use.J Clin Med Res. 2012 Apr;4(2):119-26. doi: 10.4021/jocmr810w. Epub 2012 Mar 23. J Clin Med Res. 2012. PMID: 22505985 Free PMC article.
-
Reversal of Opioid Intoxication in an Infant With Intrauterine Growth Restriction With a Single Dose of Naloxone.Cureus. 2021 Oct 19;13(10):e18908. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18908. eCollection 2021 Oct. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34804741 Free PMC article.
-
Pain relief in labor: a survey of awareness, attitude, and practice of health care providers in Zaria, Nigeria.J Pain Res. 2011;4:227-32. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S21085. Epub 2011 Aug 17. J Pain Res. 2011. PMID: 21887120 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical