Performance of epigenetic markers SEPT9 and ALX4 in plasma for detection of colorectal precancerous lesions
- PMID: 20140221
- PMCID: PMC2816214
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009061
Performance of epigenetic markers SEPT9 and ALX4 in plasma for detection of colorectal precancerous lesions
Abstract
Background: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has shown to reduce cancer-related mortality, however, acceptance and compliance to current programmes are poor. Developing new, more acceptable non-invasive tests for the detection of cancerous and precancerous colorectal lesions would not only allow preselection of individuals for colonoscopy, but may also prevent cancer by removal of precancerous lesions.
Methods: Plasma from 128 individuals (cohort I - exploratory study: 73 cases / 55 controls) was used to test the performance of a single marker, SEPT9, using a real-time quantitative PCR assay. To validate performance of SEPT9, plasma of 76 individuals (cohort II - validation study: 54 cases / 22 controls) was assessed. Additionally, improvement of predictive capability considering SEPT9 and additionally ALX4 methylation was investigated within these patients.
Results: In both cohorts combined, methylation of SEPT9 was observed in 9% of controls (3/33), 29% of patients with colorectal precancerous lesions (27/94) and 73% of colorectal cancer patients (24/33). The presence of both SEPT9 and ALX4 markers was analysed in cohort II and was observed in 5% of controls (1/22) and 37% of patients with polyps (18/49). Interestingly, also 3/5 (60%) patients with colorectal cancer were tested positive by the two marker panel in plasma.
Conclusions: While these data confirm the detection rate of SEPT9 as a biomarker for colorectal cancer, they also show that methylated DNA from advanced precancerous colorectal lesions can be detected using a panel of two DNA methylation markers, ALX4 and SEPT9. If confirmed in larger studies these data indicate that screening for colorectal precancerous lesions with a blood-based test may be as feasible as screening for invasive cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
[Hypermethylation of the CDH1, SEPT9, HLTF and ALX4 genes and their diagnostic significance in colorectal cancer].Vopr Onkol. 2010;56(2):162-8. Vopr Onkol. 2010. PMID: 20552891 Russian.
-
Development of a multiplex MethyLight assay for the detection of multigene methylation in human colorectal cancer.Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010 Oct 1;202(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.05.018. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010. PMID: 20804913
-
A novel screening method of DNA methylation biomarkers helps to improve the detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.Cancer Med. 2023 Nov;12(21):20626-20638. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6511. Epub 2023 Oct 25. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37881109 Free PMC article.
-
From discovery to the clinic: the novel DNA methylation biomarker (m)SEPT9 for the detection of colorectal cancer in blood.Epigenomics. 2010 Aug;2(4):575-85. doi: 10.2217/epi.10.35. Epigenomics. 2010. PMID: 22121975 Review.
-
Detection of colorectal cancer by DNA methylation biomarker SEPT9: past, present and future.Biomark Med. 2014;8(5):755-69. doi: 10.2217/bmm.14.8. Biomark Med. 2014. PMID: 25123042 Review.
Cited by
-
Methylated APC and RASSF1A in multiple specimens contribute to the differential diagnosis of patients with undetermined solitary pulmonary nodules.J Thorac Dis. 2015 Mar;7(3):422-32. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.24. J Thorac Dis. 2015. PMID: 25922721 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review: non-endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Apr;55(7):778-788. doi: 10.1111/apt.16824. Epub 2022 Feb 18. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 35181895 Free PMC article.
-
Translational Application of Circulating DNA in Oncology: Review of the Last Decades Achievements.Cells. 2019 Oct 14;8(10):1251. doi: 10.3390/cells8101251. Cells. 2019. PMID: 31615102 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Assessment of septin9 DNA Methylation for Colorectal Cancer Using Blood Detection: A Meta-Analysis.Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Oct;25(4):1525-1534. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0559-5. Epub 2018 Nov 28. Pathol Oncol Res. 2019. PMID: 30488278
-
Epigenetic alteration: new insights moving from tissue to plasma - the example of PCDH10 promoter methylation in colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2013 Aug 6;109(3):807-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.351. Epub 2013 Jul 9. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23839493 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10–30. - PubMed
-
- Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–592. - PubMed
-
- Song K, Fendrick AM, Ladabaum U. Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1270–1279. - PubMed
-
- Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications. JAMA. 2003;289:1297–1302. - PubMed
-
- Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2704–2714. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical