Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 May;25(5):639-43.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0884-y. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients

Peter K Baier et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical site infections (SSI) cause excess morbidity and mortality in modern surgery. Several different approaches to reduce the incidence of SSI have been investigated with variable results.

Method: This is to our knowledge the first systematic randomized evaluation in patients undergoing laparotomy in visceral surgery to clarify whether widely used subcutaneous drains (Redon) affect wound infection as the primary outcome measure.

Results: In 200 patients, we were unable to show a statistically significant impact on the postoperative healing process in patients with the full variety of abdominal surgical interventions. Overall, we observed surgical site infection in 9.5% of all patients (n = 19), of these n = 9 (47.4%) were in the control group without a drain, and 10 (52.6%) were in the experimental group with a Redon drain (not significant).

Conclusion: As this study could not demonstrate a reduction of SSI by the use of Redon drains, there is no indication for prophylactic subcutaneous suction drains after laparotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1984 Nov;148(5):618-20 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):71-5 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1119-23 - PubMed
    1. Chirurg. 1997 Jan;68(1):63-7 - PubMed
    1. Z Gesamte Hyg. 1990 Feb;36(2):94-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources