Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?
- PMID: 20140830
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243846
Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?
Abstract
Background and study aims: Many papers have been published in the field of diagnostic endoscopy in the last few years. However, there are no reports on their quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate quality in recently published endoscopic articles.
Materials and methods: The study reviewed published articles on diagnostic endoscopy from 1998 to 2008. Quality was assessed and independently quantified by two observers using the STARD (STandards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials) statements. The interobserver proportion of agreement and kappa coefficient were estimated.
Results: A total of 120 articles comprising 10 randomized controlled trials and 110 diagnostic accuracy studies were evaluated. Most studies related to colonic polyp detection (30 %) or evaluation of Barrett's esophagus (29 %). Chromoscopy (45 %), fluorescence (21 %), and narrow-band imaging (14 %) were the technologies most often evaluated. The mean number of items (i. e. standard requirements) fulfilled by the randomized controlled trials was 15.7 +/- 2.2 out of 22 while for the diagnostic accuracy studies it was 12.2 +/- 3.6 out of 25. Reporting of study results was complete in 90 % of the randomized controlled trials, but only 65 % of the diagnostic accuracy studies presented a cross-table of results. The global proportion of agreement between observers was 97 % in randomized controlled trials and 95 % in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Conclusions: Recent publications in diagnostic endoscopy achieve only medium quality according to the available statements. It seems that it would be useful for authors, reviewers, and editors to be familiar with and apply these statements. The development of a specific checklist for diagnostic endoscopy publications might be helpful toward achieving better quality reporting in the future.
(c) Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart . New York.
Similar articles
-
Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.050. Epub 2006 Sep 14. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16978620
-
The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals.Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;89(3):261-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.051862. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 15722299 Free PMC article.
-
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?Neurology. 2006 Sep 12;67(5):792-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238386.41398.30. Neurology. 2006. PMID: 16966539
-
[Reporting guidelines are also useful for readers of medical research publications: CONSORT, STARD, STROBE and others].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Oct;134(41):2078-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1237560. Epub 2009 Oct 2. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009. PMID: 19802771 Review. German.
-
Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jan;119(1):18-22. doi: 10.1309/8EXC-CM6Y-R1TH-UBAF. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003. PMID: 12520693 Review.
Cited by
-
The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Nov 3;5:120. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0500-z. eCollection 2019. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019. PMID: 31700654 Free PMC article.
-
The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimates.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 25;13:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-113. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012. PMID: 22730931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of Adherence of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Published in Radiology Journals to STARD Statement Indexed in Web of Science, PubMed & Scopus in 2015.J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018 Sep 1;8(3):311-324. eCollection 2018 Sep. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018. PMID: 30320035 Free PMC article.
-
Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research.BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e026589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026589. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31076472 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review and STARD Scoring of Renal Cell Carcinoma Circulating Diagnostic Biomarker Manuscripts.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Jun 8;4(5):pkaa050. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa050. eCollection 2020 Oct. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020. PMID: 33134830 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources