Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 May;77(5):758-64.

Pharmacokinetics of percutaneous estradiol: a crossover study using a gel and a transdermal system in comparison with oral micronized estradiol

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2014092
Clinical Trial

Pharmacokinetics of percutaneous estradiol: a crossover study using a gel and a transdermal system in comparison with oral micronized estradiol

R T Scott Jr et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 May.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of three transdermal estradiol (E2) replacement regimens were studied following establishment of steady-state dynamics. Oestrogel 3.0 mg, Oestrogel 1.5 mg, and Estraderm transdermal delivery system 4 mg (0.05 mg/day) were administered for 14 days each to 15 postmenopausal volunteers, with a 14-day washout period between each regimen. The percutaneous E2 pharmacokinetics were compared with an oral micronized E2 preparation. Venous samples were obtained at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours on 3 sequential days 11 days after initial application of the Oestrogel and the transdermal delivery system, and at the same times after oral E2 ingestion. All three percutaneous regimens provided nearly constant serum E2 and estrone (E1) levels throughout their use. The mean serum E2 levels were 102.9 +/- 39.9, 68.1 +/- 27.4, and 41.1 +/- 13.5 pg/mL for Oestrogel 3.0 mg, Oestrogel 1.5 mg, and Estraderm, respectively. Oral E2 resulted in a mean serum E2 level of 114.0 +/- 65.2 pg/mL with marked peak and nadir values. The E1/E2 ratio was comparable with all three percutaneous regimens (1.08-1.33) and was significantly lower than that found with oral Estrace (5.05).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources