[Management of second twin delivery]
- PMID: 20141909
- DOI: 10.1016/S0368-2315(09)73568-9
[Management of second twin delivery]
Abstract
Objective: To determine the optimal mode of delivery of the second twin according to his presentation.
Methods: The PubMed data base has been consulted.
Results: Considering longer intertwin intervals are correlated with poorer umbilical artery blood gas results and are associated with greater rates of cesareans for the second twin after vaginal birth of the first twin and increased neonatal morbidity of the second twin, second twin delivery should be actively managed for reducing this interval (EL3). In case of non cephalic presentation of the second twin, immediate total breech extraction, after internal version in case of transverse lie, could be associated with lower rates of cesareans for the second twin (EL3). In these situations, external version might be deleterious (EL3). In case of cephalic presentation above a 0 station, and if the obstetrical team is trained in obstetrical maneuvers, internal version followed by immediate total breech extraction could be preferred to the association of maternal pushing efforts, oxytocin infusion and artificial rupture of the membranes, because this first strategy might be associated with less cesareans for the second twin (EL4). In case of cephalic presentation at or below a 0 station, management of second twin delivery should consist in the association of maternal pushing efforts, oxytocin infusion and artificial rupture of the membranes (EL3). All the obstetrical maneuvers for second twin delivery should be performed in first intent with intact membranes (EL5).
Conclusions: Second twin delivery should be actively managed and largely depends on the knowledge of specific obstetrical maneuvers. Training residents to these maneuvers remains a priority.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 May;156(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21277672 Review.
-
Internal Version Compared With Pushing for Delivery of Cephalic Second Twins.Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;135(6):1435-1443. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003862. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32459436
-
[Delivery of twins].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009 May;37(5):432-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 25. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009. PMID: 19394887 Review. French.
-
[Is vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy still an option? An analysis of the literature data].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009 Sep;38(5):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 Jun 30. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009. PMID: 19570620 Review. French.
-
[Active management of the second twin for vaginal delivery: ruptured versus intact membranes. Apropos a series of 182 patients].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Mar;44(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 23. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 25064725 French.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical