Adherence to hip protectors and implications for U.S. long-term care settings
- PMID: 20142065
- PMCID: PMC2846526
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.09.013
Adherence to hip protectors and implications for U.S. long-term care settings
Abstract
Objectives: Determine nursing home characteristics related to adherence to use of a hip protector (HP) to prevent fracture; also describe adherence and related resident characteristics.
Design: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of a HP in which adherence to wearing the HP was monitored by research staff 3 times a week for up to 21 months; data were collected by interviews and chart review.
Setting: Thirty-five nursing homes in Boston, St. Louis, and Baltimore.
Participants: A total of 797 eligible residents, 633 (79%) of whom passed the run-in period, 397 (63%) of whom remained in the study until the end of follow-up.
Intervention: Residents wore a single HP on their right or left side.
Measurements: In addition to regular monitoring of adherence, data were collected regarding facility characteristics, staffing, policies and procedures, perception of HPs and related experience, and research staff ratings of environmental and overall quality; and also resident demographic characteristics, and function, health, and psychosocial status.
Results: Facility characteristics related to more adherence were not being chain-affiliated; less Medicaid case-mix; fewer residents wearing HPs; more paraprofessional staff training; more rotating workers; and having administrators who were less involved in meetings.
Conclusion: Efforts to increase adherence to the use of HPs should focus on facilities with more Medicaid case-mix to reduce disparities in care, and those that have less of a culture of training. Staff may need support to increase adherence, and when adherence cannot be maintained, HP use should be targeted to those who remain adherent.
Copyright 2010 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Efficacy of a hip protector to prevent hip fracture in nursing home residents: the HIP PRO randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2007 Jul 25;298(4):413-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.4.413. JAMA. 2007. PMID: 17652295 Clinical Trial.
-
Can hip protector use in the nursing home be predicted?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Mar;55(3):350-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01015.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007. PMID: 17341236
-
Factors affecting adherence to use of hip protectors amongst residents of nursing homes--a correlation study.Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):672-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Feb 17. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007. PMID: 16487529
-
Preventing fractures with hip protectors.Director. 2007 Autumn;15(4):12-6; quiz 17. Director. 2007. PMID: 19343862 Review.
-
Relationship between staff and quality of care in care homes: StaRQ mixed methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(8):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GWTT8143. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 38634535
Cited by
-
Vitamin D and hip protectors in osteosarcopenia: a combined hip fracture preventing approach.Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2025 Feb;26(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11154-024-09907-8. Epub 2024 Oct 1. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2025. PMID: 39352578 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Discrete particle model for cement infiltration within open-cell structures: Prevention of osteoporotic fracture.PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0199035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199035. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29898001 Free PMC article.
-
Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey.BMC Geriatr. 2017 May 3;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0493-5. BMC Geriatr. 2017. PMID: 28468679 Free PMC article.
-
Non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis: a consensus of the Belgian Bone Club.Osteoporos Int. 2011 Nov;22(11):2769-88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1545-x. Epub 2011 Mar 1. Osteoporos Int. 2011. PMID: 21360219 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Osteoporosis in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: Update on Consensus Recommendations for Fracture Prevention.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):852-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jun 24. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27349626 Free PMC article.
References
-
- US Department of Health and Human Services . Hospital Inpatient Statistics 1996-1999. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; Rockville, MD: 1999. AHCPR Publication 99-0034.
-
- Magaziner J, Fredman L, Hawkes W, et al. Changes in functional status attributable to hip fracture: a comparison of hip fracture patents to community-dwelling aged. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:1023–1031. - PubMed
-
- Zimmerman S, Girman CJ, Buie VC, et al. The prevalence of osteoporosis in nursing home residents. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:151–157. - PubMed
-
- Ooms ME, Vlasman P, Lips P, et al. The incidence of hip fractures in independent and institutionalized elderly people. Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:6–10. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous