A comparison of clinical presentations, angiographic patterns and outcomes of in-stent restenosis between bare metal stents and drug eluting stents
- PMID: 20142201
- DOI: 10.4244/eijv5i7a141
A comparison of clinical presentations, angiographic patterns and outcomes of in-stent restenosis between bare metal stents and drug eluting stents
Abstract
Aims: This paper studies in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) in all consecutive patients between 2004 and 2007 undergoing PCI for ISR lesions at our centre.
Methods and results: We compared the clinical presentation, pattern and angiographic outcomes in 838 patients with BMS ISR (487) and SES ISR (351). About 18% of the patients presented with acute coronary syndrome with 2% presenting as ST elevation myocardial infarction, similar in both groups. Angiographic pattern was predominantly focal with SES ISR (47%SES ISR vs. 19% BMS ISR; p<0.001) and diffuse with BMS ISR (SES ISR 16% vs. BMS ISR 36%; p=0.003). In our series the use of balloon angioplasty was higher for the treatment of SES ISR patients as compared to BMS ISR (41.6% vs. 18.3%; p<0.001) and the usage of stent was higher in BMS ISR patients (38.6% vs. 23.4%; p<0.001). Angiographic recurrent restenosis with conventional treatment in a consecutive series of patients was 38.6% and target lesion revascularisation was seen in 33.6%. These outcomes were seen slightly higher in SES ISR group (41.1% vs. 36.9%, p=ns). We have identified unstable angina at presentation (OR 3.02; 95%CI: 1.58-5.77, p=0.001), focal pattern of ISR (OR 0.50; 95% CI: .25-.99, p=0.04), stent usage (OR .25; 95% CI .13-.47, p<0.001), and baseline% diameter stenosis (OR1.03; 95%CI: 1.03-1.06, p=0.01) as independent predictors of BMS ISR recurrent restenosis. Unstable angina, focal pattern of ISR, reference vessel diameter, and% diameter stenosis were shown to be independent predictors of SES ISR.
Conclusions: ISR is not a benign condition, and one fifth of the patients presented with acute coronary syndrome. The pattern of restenosis is predominantly non-focal with BMS ISR and focal with SES ISR. Recurrent restenosis rates are high following conventional treatment and further optimal therapies mainly with SES ISR needs to defined.
Similar articles
-
Repeated sirolimus-eluting stent implantation to treat sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent restenosis.Circ J. 2010 Nov;74(11):2329-33. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0210. Epub 2010 Sep 28. Circ J. 2010. PMID: 20890050
-
Impact of stent length on restenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis based on data from the Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON).EuroIntervention. 2009 Jun;5(2):219-23. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i2a34. EuroIntervention. 2009. PMID: 19527979 Clinical Trial.
-
Differences in tissue characterization of restenotic neointima between sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent: integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound analysis for in-stent restenosis.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;14(10):996-1001. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet003. Epub 2013 Jan 22. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23341147
-
Drug-Coated Balloons versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with In-Stent Restenosis: A Pair-Wise Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Jan 21;2020:1042329. doi: 10.1155/2020/1042329. eCollection 2020. Cardiovasc Ther. 2020. PMID: 32411298 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of cilostazol in reducing restenosis in patients undergoing contemporary stent based PCI: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.EuroIntervention. 2009 Aug;5(3):384-93. doi: 10.4244/v5i3a60. EuroIntervention. 2009. PMID: 19736165 Review.
Cited by
-
Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Oct 11;9(2):79-90. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.148. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21989052 Review.
-
Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion.Int J Gen Med. 2021 Sep 15;14:5749-5758. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S328332. eCollection 2021. Int J Gen Med. 2021. PMID: 34552350 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis-evidence for universal recommendation?J Thorac Dis. 2015 Oct;7(10):1672-5. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.16. J Thorac Dis. 2015. PMID: 26623079 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Return of the Vulnerable Plaque: Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of a Case of a Late In-Stent Restenotic Chronic Total Occlusion.Int J Angiol. 2017 Sep;26(3):191-195. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1583764. Epub 2016 May 26. Int J Angiol. 2017. PMID: 28924344 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Glycemic Control During Follow-up on Late Target Lesion Revascularization After Implantation of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Diabetes - A Single-Center Observational Study.Circ Rep. 2020 Aug 4;2(9):479-489. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0065. Circ Rep. 2020. PMID: 33693273 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous