Failure of automated telephone outreach with speech recognition to improve colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 20142572
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.522
Failure of automated telephone outreach with speech recognition to improve colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Automated telephone outreach with speech recognition (ATO-SR) is used extensively by health plans. Whether ATO-SR can increase rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is unknown.
Methods: We randomly allocated 40 000 health plan members to ATO-SR and 40 000 to usual care, of whom 10 432 and 10 506 in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively, had not been previously screened and were therefore eligible for analysis. The intervention was a single interactive outreach call using speech recognition to engage participants in conversation about the importance of CRC screening and options for and barriers to screening. The intervention directed participants to contact their primary care provider to schedule screening. The primary end point was any CRC screening in the year following intervention. Colonoscopy in the year following intervention was a secondary outcome.
Results: The incidence of any CRC screening was 30.6% in the intervention group and 30.4% in the usual care group (P = .76). After adjustment for available covariates, there remained no intervention effect (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.07). A total of 21.4% of members in the intervention group and 20.3% in the usual care group underwent colonoscopy (P = .04). In multivariate analysis, there was a small intervention effect on colonoscopy (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16).
Conclusions: This study showed that ATO-SR failed to improve rates of CRC screening. Future studies should examine approaches that combine efforts to target patients and their health care providers to overcome the barriers to CRC screening. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00792285.
Comment in
-
Clinic-based population management is preferable to health plan-based population management.Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):997-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.177. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20548019 No abstract available.
-
Patient-centric colorectal cancer screening improvement strategies.Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 28;170(12):1088-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.157. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20585083 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening from patients enrolled in a managed care health plan.Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1230-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23290. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18266204 Clinical Trial.
-
Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 12;169(1):47-55. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.519. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19139323 Clinical Trial.
-
Process evaluation in an intervention designed to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening in a VA medical center.Health Promot Pract. 2007 Jul;8(3):273-81. doi: 10.1177/1524839907302210. Health Promot Pract. 2007. PMID: 17606952 Clinical Trial.
-
Costs and cost-effectiveness of a low-intensity patient-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening.J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5248-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4098. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 18024871
-
Improving colorectal cancer screening and care in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare system.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2009 Jan;8(1):22-8. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2009.n.004. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19203893 Review.
Cited by
-
Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake.ISRN Oncol. 2014 Mar 5;2014:425787. doi: 10.1155/2014/425787. eCollection 2014. ISRN Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24729896 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of interactive voice response, patient mailing, and mailed registry to encourage screening for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.Osteoporos Int. 2014 May;25(5):1519-26. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2629-1. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Osteoporos Int. 2014. PMID: 24566584 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):41-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2506-1. Epub 2013 Jul 2. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 23818159 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Designing audience-centered interactive voice response messages to promote cancer screenings among low-income Latinas.Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Mar 13;11:E40. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130213. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014. PMID: 24625364 Free PMC article.
-
Coordinating Health Care With Artificial Intelligence-Supported Technology for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 13;11(4):e34470. doi: 10.2196/34470. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022. PMID: 35416784 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous