Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam
- PMID: 20142584
- PMCID: PMC2831048
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp533
Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam
Abstract
Dissemination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the United States coincided with an increasing incidence of prostate cancer, a shift to earlier stage disease at diagnosis, and decreasing prostate cancer mortality. We compared PSA screening performance with respect to prostate cancer detection in the US population vs in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC-Rotterdam). We developed a simulation model for prostate cancer and PSA screening for ERSPC-Rotterdam. This model was then adapted to the US population by replacing demography parameters with US-specific ones and the screening protocol with the frequency of PSA tests in the US population. We assumed that the natural progression of prostate cancer and the sensitivity of a PSA test followed by a biopsy were the same in the United States as in ERSPC-Rotterdam. The predicted prostate cancer incidence peak in the United States was then substantially higher than the observed prostate cancer incidence peak (13.3 vs 8.1 cases per 1000 man-years). However, the actual observed incidence was reproduced by assuming a substantially lower PSA test sensitivity in the United States than in ERSPC-Rotterdam. For example, for nonpalpable local- or regional-stage cancers (ie, stage T1M0), the estimates of PSA test sensitivity were 0.26 in the United States vs 0.94 in ERSPC-Rotterdam. We conclude that the efficacy of PSA screening in detecting prostate cancer was lower in the United States than in ERSPC-Rotterdam.
Figures


Comment in
-
Efficacy vs effectiveness in prostate-specific antigen screening.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):288-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq002. Epub 2010 Feb 8. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010. PMID: 20142583 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):374-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. Epub 2009 Mar 10. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19276453 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials.Cancer. 2018 Mar 15;124(6):1197-1206. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31178. Epub 2017 Dec 6. Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29211316 Free PMC article.
-
Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.Int J Cancer. 2003 Jun 20;105(3):394-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11074. Int J Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12704675 Clinical Trial.
-
Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3. Can J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15780157 Review.
-
Randomized controlled screening trials for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen: a tale of contrasts.World J Urol. 2012 Apr;30(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0799-4. Epub 2011 Nov 25. World J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22116599 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment of local-regional prostate cancer detected by PSA screening: benefits and harms according to prognostic factors.Br J Cancer. 2013 May 28;108(10):1971-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.198. Epub 2013 May 14. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23674085 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate cancer screening: current status and future perspectives.Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Sep;7(9):487-93. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.120. Nat Rev Urol. 2010. PMID: 20818326 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis.Radiology. 2020 Oct;297(1):40-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192505. Epub 2020 Aug 4. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32749212 Free PMC article.
-
What if I don't treat my PSA-detected prostate cancer? Answers from three natural history models.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 May;20(5):740-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0718. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011. PMID: 21546365 Free PMC article.
-
Economic Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Selective Treatment Strategies.JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;2(7):890-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6275. JAMA Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27010943 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Legler JM, Feuer EJ, Potosky AL, Merrill RM, Kramer BS. The role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing patterns in the recent prostate cancer incidence decline in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9(5):519–527. - PubMed
-
- Pinsky PF, Andriole GL, Kramer BS, et al. Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Urol. 2005;173(3):746–750. discussion 750–751. - PubMed
-
- Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–1328. - PubMed
-
- Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, et al. Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(12):868–878. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous