Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;16(2):69-74.
doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.53864.

Prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and other eye problems among urban and rural school children

Affiliations

Prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and other eye problems among urban and rural school children

Amruta S Padhye et al. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Uncorrected refractive error is an avoidable cause of visual impairment.

Aim: To compare the magnitude and determinants of uncorrected refractive error, such as age, sex, family history of refractive error and use of spectacles among school children 6-15 years old in urban and rural Maharashtra, India.

Study design: This was a review of school-based vision screening conducted in 2004-2005.

Materials and methods: Optometrists assessed visual acuity, amblyopia and strabismus in rural children. Teachers assessed visual acuity and then optometrists confirmed their findings in urban schools. Ophthalmologists screened for ocular pathology. Data of uncorrected refractive error, amblyopia, strabismus and blinding eye diseases was analyzed to compare the prevalence and risk factors among children of rural and urban areas.

Results: We examined 5,021 children of 8 urban clusters and 7,401 children of 28 rural clusters. The cluster-weighted prevalence of uncorrected refractive error in urban and rural children was 5.46% (95% CI, 5.44-5.48) and 2.63% (95% CI, 2.62-2.64), respectively. The prevalence of myopia, hypermetropia and astigmatism in urban children was 3.16%, 1.06% and 0.16%, respectively. In rural children, the prevalence of myopia, hypermetropia and astigmatism was 1.45%, 0.39% and 0.21%, respectively. The prevalence of amblyopia was 0.8% in urban and 0.2% in rural children. Thirteen to 15 years old children attending urban schools were most likely to have uncorrected myopia.

Conclusion: The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error, especially myopia, was higher in urban children. Causes of higher prevalence and barriers to refractive error correction services should be identified and addressed. Eye screening of school children is recommended. However, the approach used may be different for urban and rural school children.

Keywords: Blindness; Refractive Error; School Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:63–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Elimination of avoidable visual disability due to refractive error Report of an informal planning meeting. pp. 6–10. WHO/PBL/00.79.
    1. School screening for eye ailment in. Available from: http://www.pbmaindia.org/projects.htm. [last accessed on 2008 July 12]
    1. David Abrahams. Astigmatism. In: Duke, editor. Elder's Practice of Refraction. 10th ed. Butterworth Heinemann; 2002. p. 65.
    1. Webber AL. Amblyopia treatment: An evidence-based approach to maximising treatment outcome. Clin Exp Optom. 2007;90:250–7. - PubMed