Accuracy of the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring system: comparison with frequently sampled venous glucose measurements
- PMID: 20144429
- PMCID: PMC2769895
- DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300519
Accuracy of the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring system: comparison with frequently sampled venous glucose measurements
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements obtained from the DexCom SEVEN system with Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) laboratory measurements of venous blood glucose.
Methods: Seventy-two subjects with insulin-requiring diabetes, aged 18-71, were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective single-arm study. All participants wore the SEVEN continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for one, 7-day wear period. Calibration with capillary finger stick measurements was performed 2 hours after sensor insertion and once every 12 hours thereafter. A subset of subjects (28) wore two systems simultaneously to assess precision. All subjects participated in one, 10-hour in-clinic session on day 1, 4, or 7 of the study to compare CGM measurements against a laboratory method (YSI analyzer) using venous measurements taken once every 20 minutes. Carbohydrate consumption and insulin dosing were adjusted in order to obtain a broad range of glucose values.
Results: Comparison of CGM measurements with the laboratory reference method (n = 2318) gave mean and median absolute relative differences (ARDs) of 16.7 and 13.2%, respectively. The percentage was 70.4% in the clinically accurate Clarke error grid A zone and 27.5% in the benign error B zone. Performance of the SEVEN system was consistent over time with mean and median ARD lowest on day 7 as compared to YSI (13.3 and 10.2%, respectively). Average sensor time lag was 5 minutes.
Conclusions: Measurements of the DexCom SEVEN system were found to be consistent and accurate compared with venous measurements made using a laboratory reference method over 7 days of wear.
2009 Diabetes Technology Society.
Figures


Comment on
-
An analysis of the SEVEN system: have we reached the summit of needle-type sensor accuracy?J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):1155-7. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300520. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009. PMID: 20144430 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Dec;11(12):749-55. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0075. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009. PMID: 20001675 Clinical Trial.
-
The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in Chinese diabetes patients: a multicenter study.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Aug;14(8):710-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0014. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012. PMID: 22853722 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis of the SEVEN system: have we reached the summit of needle-type sensor accuracy?J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):1155-7. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300520. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009. PMID: 20144430 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons of Fifth-, Sixth-, and Seventh-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):143-147. doi: 10.1177/19322968221099879. Epub 2022 Jun 13. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 35695305 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges to glycemic measurement in the perioperative and critically ill patient: a review.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;3(6):1270-81. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300606. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009. PMID: 20144380 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):801-7. doi: 10.1177/1932296815578716. Epub 2015 Apr 7. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015. PMID: 25852074 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Performance Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Reporting.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1506-1526. doi: 10.1177/19322968231190941. Epub 2023 Aug 20. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 37599389 Free PMC article.
-
Pilot study of a prototype minimally invasive intradermal continuous glucose monitor.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 1;6(6):1454-63. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600627. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012. PMID: 23294793 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous glucose monitoring accuracy results vary between assessment at home and assessment at the clinical research center.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1103-6. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600514. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012. PMID: 23063036 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring algorithm.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):111-8. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400114. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010. PMID: 20167174 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Skyler JS. The economic burden of diabetes and the benefits of improved glycemic control: the potential role of a continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2(Suppl. 1):S7–S12. - PubMed
-
- Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1231–1239. - PubMed
-
- Buckingham B, Block J, Wilson DM. Continuous glucose monitoring. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2005;12:273–279. - PubMed
-
- Bailey T, Zisser H, Garg S. Reduction in reduction in hemoglobin A1c with real-time continuous glucose monitoring: results from a 12-week observational study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;9(3):203–209. - PubMed
-
- Garg S, Jovanovic L. Relationship of fasting and hourly blood glucose levels to HbA1c values: safety, accuracy, and improvements in glucose profiles obtained using a 7-day continuous glucose sensor. Diabetes Care. 2005;29(12):2644–2649. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical