Influence of pupil size and other test variables on visual function assessment using visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
- PMID: 20145988
- PMCID: PMC3003143
- DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9222-5
Influence of pupil size and other test variables on visual function assessment using visual evoked potentials in normal subjects
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of pupil size and optical blur on measurements obtained with isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP). Two stimulus conditions of icVEP, +15 and -15% contrasts, were studied in normal subjects with normal (N), miotic (M), and dilated (D) pupils. The effects of optical blur were studied in subjects with normal pupil. Response to visual stimuli was quantified by a signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio. In 30 normal subjects, the mean age was 26.0 +/- 3.4 years. Mean pupil diameters were N = 4.2 +/- 0.6 mm, M = 2.7 +/- 0.6 mm, and D = 7.3 +/- 0.9 mm. For both +15 and -15% contrast levels, mean SNR values were reduced for dilated and constricted pupils when compared with normal pupils. Mean SNR values for optical blur with a +2 or +3 diopter lens placed over the distance correction were reduced when compared with SNR measurements obtained with best-corrected visual acuity under both +15 and -15% contrast levels. Statistical significance was found in comparisons of N versus M (P < 0.001) and N versus D (P = 0.002) for +15 and -15% contrast conditions, respectively. No statistical difference was seen for M versus D (P = -0.435). The effect of optical blur was statistically significant when compared to the normal pupils with best-corrected vision (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found comparing +2 and +3 diopters lenses for optical blur testing. Visual evoked potential values are influenced by pupillary constriction and dilation, as well as optical blur. When obtaining icVEP measurements, the influence of pupil size and optical blur should be kept in mind for accurate interpretations.
Similar articles
-
Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.051. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007. PMID: 17321393
-
Effects of pupil diameter on light detection and temporal modulation.Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2003 Sep;19(3):137-41. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2003. PMID: 14574966
-
Constant luminance (cd·s/m2) versus constant retinal illuminance (Td·s) stimulation in flicker ERGs.Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;134(2):75-87. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9572-3. Epub 2017 Feb 3. Doc Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28160194 Free PMC article.
-
[Pupil and melanopsin photoreception].Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Mar;117(3):246-68; discussion 269. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2013. PMID: 23631256 Review. Japanese.
-
Diurnal visual changes in radial keratotomy: implications for visual standards. Refractive Surgery Study Group.Optom Vis Sci. 1994 Aug;71(8):516-21. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199408000-00005. Optom Vis Sci. 1994. PMID: 7970568 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of isolated-check visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma and high-risk ocular hypertension.Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 18;10(4):599-604. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.04.16. eCollection 2017. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28503434 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of isolated-check visual evoked potentials for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04221-6. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40640806 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance of isolated-check visual evoked potential versus retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer analysis in early primary open-angle glaucoma.BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 May 22;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0472-9. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28532392 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources