Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;53(5):890-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1670-7. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

Assessing prediction of diabetes in older adults using different adiposity measures: a 7 year prospective study in 6,923 older men and women

Affiliations

Assessing prediction of diabetes in older adults using different adiposity measures: a 7 year prospective study in 6,923 older men and women

S G Wannamethee et al. Diabetologia. 2010 May.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to examine whether waist circumference (WC) or WHR improve diabetes prediction beyond body mass index in older men and women, and to define optimal cut-off points.

Methods: In this prospective study, non-diabetic men (n = 3,519) and women (n = 3,404) aged 60-79 years were followed up for 7 years. There were 169 and 128 incident cases of type 2 diabetes in men and women, respectively.

Results: BMI, WC and WHR all showed strong associations with incident type 2 diabetes independent of potential confounders. In men, the adjusted relative risks (top vs lowest quartile) were 4.71 (95% CI 2.45-9.03) for BMI, 3.53 (95% CI 1.92-6.48) for WC and 2.76 (95% CI 1.58-4.82) for WHR. For women, the corresponding relative risks were 4.10 (95% CI 2.16-7.79), 12.18 (95% CI 4.83-30.74) and 5.61 (95% CI 2.84-11.09) for BMI, WC and WHR, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed similar associations for BMI and WC in predicting diabetes in men (AUC = 0.726 and 0.713, respectively); WHR was the weakest predictor (AUC = 0.656). In women, WC was a significantly stronger predictor (AUC = 0.780) than either BMI (AUC = 0.733) or WHR (AUC = 0.728; p < 0.01 for both). Inclusion of both WC and BMI did not improve prediction beyond BMI alone in men or WC alone in women. Optimal sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of type 2 diabetes was observed at a WC of 100 cm in men and 92 cm in women.

Conclusions/interpretation: In older men, BMI and WC yielded similar prediction of risk of type 2 diabetes, whereas WC was clearly a superior predictor in older women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The ROC curves (unadjusted) for BMI, WC and WHR for (a) men and (b) women. ROC area in men: BMI 0.726; WHR 0.656; WC 0.713. ROC area in women: BMI 0.733; WHR 0.728; WC 0.780

References

    1. Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO; Obesity Society; American Society for Nutrition; American Diabetes Association; Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO, the Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association et al. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from shaping America’s health. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1647–1652. doi: 10.2337/dc07-9921. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallergher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB. How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex and ethnic groups? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:228–239. - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6:51S–209S. - PubMed
    1. Wei M, Gaskill SP, Haffner SM, Stern MP. Waist circumference as the best predictor of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) compared to body mass index, waist/hip ratio and other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americans—a 7-year prospective study. Obes Res. 1997;5:16–23. - PubMed
    1. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group The relationship of body size and shape to the development of diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Obesity. 2006;14:2107–2117. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.246. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types