Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;21(6):731-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1095-3. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence

Affiliations

Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence

Artur Rogowski et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The primary aim of the study was to translate and validate a Polish version of the CONTILIFE, a quality of life questionnaire. The clinical validity of the CONTILIFE was assessed against the number of urinary leaks, Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP).

Methods: One hundred women with stress urinary incontinence completed a Polish version of the CONTILIFE twice with a 4-day interval.

Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha= 0.94) and test-retest reliability of the instrument (ICC = 0.96) were very good. A significant relationship was found between all the CONTILIFE dimension scores, the CONTILIFE global score, and the number of urinary leaks per week. A less significant relationship was found between VLPP, MUCP, and CONTILIFE dimension and global scores.

Conclusions: A Polish version of the CONTILIFE can be a reliable measure of quality of life in stress urinary incontinence patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jan;19(1):97-102 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2005 Nov;48(5):805-9 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 2):904-10 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2003 Apr;43(4):391-404 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166(6 Pt 1):1835-40; discussion 1840-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources