Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 1;82(5):1881-9.
doi: 10.1021/ac9026115.

Structural characterization of phospholipids and peptides directly from tissue sections by MALDI traveling-wave ion mobility-mass spectrometry

Affiliations

Structural characterization of phospholipids and peptides directly from tissue sections by MALDI traveling-wave ion mobility-mass spectrometry

Whitney B Ridenour et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) provides rapid two-dimensional separations based on analyte apparent surface area or collision cross section (CCS, A(2)) and mass-to-charge, respectively. Recently, traveling-wave (t-wave) IM-MS was developed which uses electrodynamic rather than electrostatic fields commonly used in drift cell IM-MS instruments. The underlying theory for obtaining CCS data is well developed for drift cell IM-MS, while strategies for obtaining CCS values from t-wave IM-MS data remains an active area of research. In this report, methods were developed and validated to obtain CCS values of phospholipids and peptides directly from thin tissue sections by MALDI t-wave IM-MS using CCS calibrants measured by MALDI drift cell IM-MS. Importantly, the average percent difference between t-wave and drift cell CCS measurements is minimized by calibrating with the same biomolecular class. Calibrating t-wave phospholipid CCS values with drift cell peptide CCS measurements results in an average percent difference of ca. 7% between the same lipids measured using t-wave and drift cell IM-MS, while this improves to <0.5% when drift cell phospholipid CCS values are used for calibrating t-wave data. A suite of CCS values are reported for lipids and peptides that were determined directly from tissue, i.e. without the need for tissue extraction and further purification steps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Measuring CCS values of phospholipids and tryptic peptides directly from rat brain tissue sections by MALDI t-wave IM-MS. A typical two-dimensional td versus m/z plot of a rat brain tissue section after trypsin application collected by MALDI t-wave IM-MS. The predicted correlation of drift time versus m/z for phospholipids and tryptic peptides at these experimental conditions are indicated by dashed lines for visualization purposes. Signal intensity is indicated by the displayed false color scale.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Calibration curves of normalized CCS versus effective drift time used to estimate CCS values of (A) phospholipids and (B) tryptic peptides directly from tissue sections. Data from 5 different wave heights are each plotted whereby the correlation line represents a power fit to the data. Since t-wave IM-MS CCS values were calculated using the td values obtained directly from a complex sample, only td values for peaks containing a single species when analyzed by FTICR were used. Calibration curves of phospholipid standards have R2 values > 0.95 and calibration curves of BSA tryptic peptides have R2 values > 0.98.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of PC CCS results based on using tryptic peptide CCS and phospholipids CCS values as calibrants. MALDI t-wave IM-MS CCS values for PC species that were calibrated using either tryptic peptide CCS values (red) or phospholipid CCS values (blue) measured using MALDI drift cell IM-MS or CCS values (green) measured by ESI drift cell IM-MS., , Error bars represent ± 1σ for 5 different wave heights collected over 2 days (n=10).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
MALDI t-wave IM-MS CCS values of phospholipids obtained directly from tissue sections. Specific phospholipid species were identified by FTICR and MS/MS directly from tissue sections. MALDI t-wave IM-MS CCS values were determined using drift cell IM-MS phospholipid CCS values as calibrants. Error bars represent ± 1σ for 5 different wave heights collected over 2 days (n=10). The two SM species which fall on the PC trend-line were identified as [SM 22:0 + Na]+ and [SM 22:0 + K]+.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
MALDI t-wave IM-MS tryptic peptide CCS values from an in-solution digest. T-wave IM-MS CCS values of tryptic peptides from a BSA digest were determined using BSA tryptic peptide CCS values measured by MALDI drift cell IM-MS as calibrants. The error bars (all are < 2.0%) represent ± 1σ for 5 different wave heights collected over 2 days (n=10). Correlation between MALDI drift cell IM-MS and MALDI t-wave IM-MS CCS values result in an R2 value > 0.98, where the dashed line represents a 1:1 correlation.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
MALDI t-wave IM-MS CCS values of tryptic peptides measured directly from tissue sections. CCS values were calibrated using MALDI drift tube IM-MS CCS values of BSA tryptic peptides as calibrants. Only the CCS values of confidently identified tryptic peptides sequenced by high mass accuracy and MS/MS directly from tissue sections are displayed (Table 3). Error bars (average error is < 1.5%) represent ± 1σ for 5 different wave heights collected over 2 days (n=10). For reference, SM and PC trend-lines are plotted illustrating that peptides have a lower CCS than phospholipid species of the same m/z.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Validation of MALDI t-wave IM-MS CCS values directly from tissue in comparison with those from an in solution digest. Both MALDI t-wave IM-MS and MALDI drift cell IM-MS CCS values are an average of 5 different wave heights and electrostatic fields, respectively, over two days (n = 10). Error bars represent ± 1σ. The dashed line represents a 1:1 correlation between MALDI t-wave IM-MS and MALDI drift cell IM-MS CCS values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McLean JA, Ruotolo BT, Gillig KJ, Russell DH. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2005;240:301–315.
    1. Valentine SJ, Liu XY, Plasencia MD, Hilderbrand AE, Kurulugama RT, Koeniger SL, Clemmer DE. Expert Review of Proteomics. 2005;2:553–565. - PubMed
    1. Wyttenbach T, Bowers MT. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 2007;58:511–533. - PubMed
    1. Kanu AB, Dwivedi P, Tam M, Matz L, Hill HH., Jr Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2008;43:1–22. - PubMed
    1. Jackson SN, Ugarov M, Egan T, Post JD, Langlais D, Schultz JA, Woods AS. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2007;42:1093–1098. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms