Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;15(1):43-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00338.x.

Influence of the maximum heart rate attained during exercise testing on subsequent heart rate recovery

Sina Zaim  1 , Joel Schesser, Linda S Hirsch, Ronald Rockland
Affiliations

Influence of the maximum heart rate attained during exercise testing on subsequent heart rate recovery

Sina Zaim et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Abnormal heart rate recovery (HRR) following exercise testing has been shown to be a predictor for adverse cardiovascular events. The actual maximum heart rate (MHR) attained during the exercise test does not however have a distinct significance in traditional HRR assessment. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of MHR in HRR.

Methods: This prospective study consisted of 164 patients (62% male, mean age 53.7 + or - 11.7 years) who were referred for a symptom-limited standard Bruce Protocol treadmill exercise test, based on clinical indications. The patients were seated immediately at test completion and the heart rate (HR) recorded at one and two minutes postexercise. A normal HRR was defined as a HR drop of 18 beats per minute or more at the end of the first minute of recovery. The HRR profile of patients who reached > or = 85% of their maximum predicted heart rate (MPHR) during peak exercise were then compared to HRR profile of those who could not.

Results: One hundred twelve patients (Group A) achieved a MHR > or = 85% of MPHR during peak exercise whereas 52 patients (Group B) did not. Chi-square analysis showed a higher incidence of normal HRR in Group A compared to Group B (p = 0.029). Analysis of variance with repeated measures showed that group A had a greater HRR at the first minute F(1,162)= 6.98, p = <0.01) but not the second minute (F(1,162)=1.83, p = .18) postexercise.

Conclusion: There is a relation between the peak heart rate attained during exercise and the subsequent HRR. A low peak heart rate increases the likelihood of a less than normal HRR. Assessment of the entire heart-rate response seems warranted for more thorough risk-stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decline in HR for group A and group B patients as function of the MPHR at 1 and 2 minutes from end of exercise, with no cool‐down period, in the sitting position. HR = heart rate; MPHR = maximum predicted heart rate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative decreases in HR at 1 and 2 minutes of recovery as a function of the MPHR (group A ≥85%, group B <85%) as well as the presence or absence of abnormal cardiac function and/or myocardial perfusion study abnormalities within each group (see text).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Imai K, Sato H, Hori M, et al Vagally mediated heart rate recovery after exercise is accelerated in athletes but blunted in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1529–1535. - PubMed
    1. Kannankeril P, Le F, Kadish A, et al Parasympathetic effects on heart rate recovery after exercise. J Investig Med 2004;52:394–401. - PubMed
    1. Sundaram S, Shoushtari C, Carnethon M, et al Autonomic and nonautonomic determinants of heart rate recovery. Heart Rhythm 2004;1:S100–S101.
    1. Lahiri MK, Kannankeril PJ, Goldberger JJ. Assessment of autonomic function in cardiovascular disease‐ physiologic basis and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1725–1733. - PubMed
    1. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, et al Baroreflex sensitivity and heart‐rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet 1998;351:478–484. - PubMed