Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 10:10:62.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-62.

Effects of worksite health promotion interventions on employee diets: a systematic review

Affiliations

Effects of worksite health promotion interventions on employee diets: a systematic review

Cliona Ni Mhurchu et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Public health strategies place increasing emphasis on opportunities to promote healthy behaviours within the workplace setting. Previous research has suggested worksite health promotion programmes have positive effects on physical activity and weight loss, yet little is known regarding their effects on dietary behaviour. The aim of this review was to assess the effects of worksite interventions on employee diets.

Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, EMBASE, LexisNexis) were searched for relevant articles published between 1995 and April 2009. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed English language publications describing a worksite-based health promotion intervention with minimum study duration of eight weeks. All study designs were eligible. Studies had to report one or more diet-related outcome (energy, fat, fruit, or vegetable intakes). Methodological quality was assessed using a checklist that included randomisation methods, use of a control group, and study attrition rates.

Results: Sixteen studies were included in the review. Eight programmes focussed on employee education, and the remainder targeted change to the worksite environment, either alone or in combination with education. Study methodological quality was moderate. In general, worksite interventions led to positive changes in fruit, vegetable and total fat intake. However, reliance on self-reported methods of dietary assessment means there is a significant risk of bias. No study measured more robust outcomes such as absenteeism, productivity, or healthcare utilisation.

Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest that worksite health promotion programmes are associated with moderate improvement in dietary intake. The quality of studies to date has been frequently sub-optimal and further, well designed studies are needed in order to reliably determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Future programmes to improve employee dietary habits should move beyond individual education and aim to intervene at multiple levels of the worksite environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of systematic search and reasons for study exclusion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ezzati MLA, Rodgers A, Hoorn S Vander, Murray CJL. the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborative Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. The Lancet. 2002;360:1347–1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rayner M, Scarborough P. The burden of food related ill health in the UK. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2005;59:1054–1057. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.036491. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ThinkFit! http://www.bhf.org.uk/thinkfit
    1. van Duijvenbode DC, Hoozemans MJM, van Poppel MNM, Proper KI. The relationship between overweight and obesity, and sick leave: a systematic review. International Journal of Obesity. 2009;33:807–816. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.121. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ForeSight. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices. London: Government Office for Science; 2008. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources