Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts
- PMID: 20147715
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902045
Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts
Abstract
Background: The leading cause of failure of a prosthetic arteriovenous hemodialysis-access graft is venous anastomotic stenosis. Balloon angioplasty, the first-line therapy, has a tendency to lead to subsequent recoil and restenosis; however, no other therapies have yet proved to be more effective. This study was designed to compare conventional balloon angioplasty with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene endovascular stent graft for revision of venous anastomotic stenosis in failing hemodialysis grafts.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter trial, randomly assigning 190 patients who were undergoing hemodialysis and who had a venous anastomotic stenosis to undergo either balloon angioplasty alone or balloon angioplasty plus placement of the stent graft. Primary end points included patency of the treatment area and patency of the entire vascular access circuit.
Results: At 6 months, the incidence of patency of the treatment area was significantly greater in the stent-graft group than in the balloon-angioplasty group (51% vs. 23%, P<0.001), as was the incidence of patency of the access circuit (38% vs. 20%, P=0.008). In addition, the incidence of freedom from subsequent interventions at 6 months was significantly greater in the stent-graft group than in the balloon-angioplasty group (32% vs. 16%, P=0.03 by the log-rank test and P=0.04 by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The incidence of binary restenosis at 6 months was greater in the balloon-angioplasty group than in the stent-graft group (78% vs. 28%, P<0.001). The incidences of adverse events at 6 months were equivalent in the two treatment groups, with the exception of restenosis, which occurred more frequently in the balloon-angioplasty group (P<0.001).
Conclusions: In this study, percutaneous revision of venous anastomotic stenosis in patients with a prosthetic hemodialysis graft was improved with the use of a stent graft, which appears to provide longer-term and superior patency and freedom from repeat interventions than standard balloon angioplasty. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00678249.)
2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Fistula first, stent graft second.N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):550-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0912187. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20147722 No abstract available.
-
Stent graft or balloon angioplasty alone for dialysis-access grafts.N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1938-9; author reply 1940. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1002826. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20484403 No abstract available.
-
Stent graft or balloon angioplasty alone for dialysis-access grafts.N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1939-40; author reply 1940. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20496464 No abstract available.
-
Stent graft or balloon angioplasty alone for dialysis-access grafts.N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1939; author reply 1940. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20496465 No abstract available.
-
Stent graft or balloon angioplasty alone for dialysis-access grafts.N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1939; author reply 1940. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20496466 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Stent grafts were more effective than balloon angioplasty alone for revision of stenosis in failing dialysis-access grafts.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 15;152(12):JC6-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-12-201006150-02008. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20547902 No abstract available.