Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 1;59(2):187.
doi: 10.1007/BF03395658.

EXCLUSION LEARNING AND EMERGENT SYMBOLIC CATEGORY FORMATION IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SEVERE LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENTS AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Affiliations

EXCLUSION LEARNING AND EMERGENT SYMBOLIC CATEGORY FORMATION IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SEVERE LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENTS AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES

Krista M Wilkinson et al. Psychol Rec. .

Abstract

We evaluated formation of simple symbolic categories from initial learning of specific dictated word-picture relations through emergence of untaught or derived relations. Participants were 10 individuals with severe intellectual and language limitations. Three experimental categories were constructed, each containing 1 spoken word (Set A), 1 photograph (Set B), and 1 visual-graphic "lexigram" (Set C). Exclusion-based learning procedures were used to teach first the 3 auditory-visual relations (A-B relations) and then the 3 visual-visual relations (B-C relations) for each category. Seven participants acquired these initial relations. The untaught relations C-B and A-C were then assessed to evaluate the emergence of symbolic categories. Participants demonstrated virtually error-free performances on C-B and A-C derived relations. The study helps to define operationally a highly useful procedural path for systematic instruction in symbolic functioning for persons with intellectual and language disabilities associated with autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Baseline stimuli. Note. From Picture Communication Symbols, by R. Mayer-Johnson, 1992, Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson. Copyright 1981–2003 by Mayer-Johnson. Used with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three stimulus categories. Solid line arrows indicate relations directly taught and tested. Dashed arrows indicate emergent relations tested.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trial structure in preliminary assessment and instruction sessions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Illustration of the successive introduction procedure.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Trial structure for equivalence testing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown L, Sherbenou RJ, Johnson SK. Test of nonverbal intelligence. 3rd ed. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 1997.
    1. Carey S, Bartlett E. Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development. 1978;15:17–29.
    1. Carr D, Felce J. Teaching picture-to-object relations in picture-based requesting by children with autism: A comparison between error prevention and error correction teaching procedures. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2008;52:309–317. - PubMed
    1. Carr D, Wilkinson KM, Blackman D, Mcilvane WJ. Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 2000;74:101–114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chapman RS, Kay-raining Bird E, Schwartz SE. Fast mapping of words in event contexts by children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1990;55:761–770. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources