Escalating weekly doses of cetuximab and correlation with skin toxicity: a phase I study
- PMID: 20148348
- PMCID: PMC4559347
- DOI: 10.1007/s10637-010-9396-4
Escalating weekly doses of cetuximab and correlation with skin toxicity: a phase I study
Abstract
Background: Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The recommended dosage is an initial load of 400 mg/m² intravenously (IV) followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m². It has been reported retrospectively that cetuximab efficacy was correlated with dose-related severity of skin rash. This study was prospectively designed to examine the safety and feasibility of escalating weekly doses of cetuximab, testing the hypothesis of the relationship of dose-dependent skin toxicity and efficacy. Methods Four dose levels were tested: Cetuximab 400 mg/m² IV loading dose and 250, 300, 350, 400 mg/m² weekly IV maintenance. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Standard dose limiting toxicity criteria were used. Rash was evaluated using two additional validated dermatology methods: global acne grading scale (GAGS) and acne lesion counting (ALC). Tumor specimens and blood samples were obtained for correlative analyses.
Results: Twenty seven patients with solid tumors were enrolled: five head and neck, three pancreas, four gall bladder, two each of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, and esophagus, and five others. Planned dose escalation was completed without reaching dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The highest dose level was expanded to a total of 17 patients. Gr 3/4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (2), fatigue (2), and hypomagnesemia (2). One patient experienced a grade 3 rash (350 mg/m²). Sixty five percent of pts had a ≥ Gr 2 rash that was not dose dependent. In 22 evaluable patients, there was one partial response (PR) in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (400 mg/m²) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). ALC and GAGS demonstrated no correlation with dose or response. Correlative studies evaluating k-ras, EGFR FISH status and immunologic correlatives were conducted on available tumor samples.
Conclusions: Cetuximab administered at 400 mg/m² IV as a loading dose with weekly maintenance dose of 400 mg/m² is feasible and well tolerated. There was no direct correlation of the grade of rash with dose in this group of patients with heterogenous solid tumors.
Figures

Similar articles
-
A phase I escalating single-dose and weekly fixed-dose study of cetuximab pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients with solid tumors.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;64(3):557-64. doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0904-6. Epub 2009 Jan 24. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19169687 Clinical Trial.
-
Dual inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor with cetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, and gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase I study.J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Mar;3(3):258-64. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181653d1b. J Thorac Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18317068 Clinical Trial.
-
A phase 1 study of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.Cancer. 2015 May 15;121(10):1645-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29224. Epub 2015 Jan 29. Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25641763 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cetuximab: an epidermal growth factor receptor chemeric human-murine monoclonal antibody.Drugs Today (Barc). 2005 Feb;41(2):107-27. doi: 10.1358/dot.2005.41.2.882662. Drugs Today (Barc). 2005. PMID: 15821783 Review.
-
[Cetuximab].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2007 Aug;34(8):1192-5. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2007. PMID: 17687200 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Where lung cancer and tuberculosis intersect: recent advances.Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 2;16:1561719. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1561719. eCollection 2025. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40242762 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neutralization of IL-8 prevents the induction of dermatologic adverse events associated with the inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor.PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039706. Epub 2012 Jun 25. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22761877 Free PMC article.
-
Methotrexate and Cetuximab-Biological Impact on Non-Tumorigenic Models: In Vitro and In Ovo Assessments.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 22;58(2):167. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020167. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 35208492 Free PMC article.
-
Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: advances and deficiencies.Anticancer Drugs. 2011 Aug;22(7):674-81. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328340fd18. Anticancer Drugs. 2011. PMID: 21037467 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Monoclonal antibody therapy of pancreatic cancer with cetuximab: potential for immune modulation.J Immunother. 2012 Jun;35(5):367-73. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3182562d76. J Immunother. 2012. PMID: 22576341 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2787–2799. - PubMed
-
- Tos APD, Ellis I. Assessing epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours: what is the value of current test methods? Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1383–1392. - PubMed
-
- Fan Z, Masui H, Altas I, et al. Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor function by bivalent and monovalent fragments of 225 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res. 1993;53:4322–4328. - PubMed
-
- Sato JD, Kawamoto T, Le AD, et al. Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors. Mol Biol Med. 1983;1:511–529. - PubMed
-
- Perez-Soler R, Saltz L. Cutaneous adverse effects with HER1/EGFR-targeted agents: is there a silver lining? J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5235–5246. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous