Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;16(2):131-8.

Geographic correlation between large-firm commercial spending and Medicare spending

Affiliations

Geographic correlation between large-firm commercial spending and Medicare spending

Michael E Chernew et al. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the correlation between geographic variation in inpatient days, total spending, and spending growth in traditional Medicare versus the large-firm commercial sector.

Study design: Retrospective descriptive analysis.

Methods: Medicare spending data at the hospital referral region (HRR) level were obtained from the Dartmouth Atlas. Commercial claims data from large employers were obtained from Thomson Reuters MarketScan Database for 1996-2006 and aggregated to the HRR level. County-level data on inpatient days per capita and market characteristics were obtained from the Area Resource File. We computed correlations between Medicare and commercial spending and spending growth, as well as Medicare and non-Medicare inpatient days, and examined traits of high- and low-spending HRRs in both sectors.

Results: We found a positive correlation between inpatient days per capita across counties, but a small inverse correlation between measures of commercial and Medicare spending across HRRs. Spending growth was weakly positively correlated across HRRs. Markets in the upper third of commercial spending had more concentrated hospital markets than markets in the lower third of commercial spending. The reverse was true for Medicare spending.

Conclusions: The positive correlation in utilization and lack of correlation in spending implies an inverse correlation in prices. This is consistent with evidence that the differences appear to be, at least partially, related to aspects of the market structure. If private markets are to work better to reduce cost, stronger efforts are needed to reduce provider market concentration and promote competitive pricing for healthcare services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care [Accessed December 21, 2009];Data tools. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/data/download.shtm.
    1. Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn AM. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973;182(117):1102–1108. - PubMed
    1. Martin AB, Whittle L, Heffler S, Barron MC, Sisko A, Washington B. Health spending by state of residence, 1991-2004. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26(6):w651–w653. - PubMed
    1. Baicker K, Chandra A. Medicare spending, the physician workforce, and beneficiaries’ quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004:w184–w197. Suppl Web Exclusives. - PubMed
    1. Weinstein JN, Bronner KK, Morgan TS, Wennberg JE. Trends: trends and geographic variations in major surgery for degenerative diseases of the hip, knee, and spine. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004:VAR81–89. Suppl Web Exclusives. - PubMed

Publication types