Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment
- PMID: 20148645
- DOI: 10.3109/02841860903536002
Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment
Abstract
Clinical guidelines for the follow-up after breast cancer recommend frequent outpatient clinic visits to be examined for a possible recurrence or a second primary breast tumour, and to receive information and psychosocial support. However, needs and preferences for follow-up may differ between patients, raising the question whether the current 'one size fits all' approach is appropriate. This study explored patients' preferences for follow-up. Patients and methods. A discrete choice experiment survey with 16 choice tasks was filled out by 331 breast cancer patients. Each choice task consisted of two hypothetical follow-up scenarios for the first year after treatment, described by levels of the following characteristics; attendance at an educational group programme, frequency of visits, waiting time, contact mode, and type of healthcare provider. Results. The healthcare provider and contact mode were the most important characteristics of follow-up to patients. The medical specialist was the most preferred to perform the follow-up, but a combination of the medical specialist and breast care nurse alternating was also acceptable to patients. Face-to-face contact was strongly preferred to telephone contact. Follow-up visits every three months were preferred over visits every four, six, or 12 months. Heterogeneity in preference between patients was strong, especially for the healthcare provider and attendance at an educational group programme. Age, education, and previous experience with follow-up characteristics influenced preferences, but treatment modality did not. Conclusion. The results of this study show that overall patient satisfaction would not differ significantly if patients have follow-up by medical specialist and breast care nurse alternating compared to follow-up by a medical specialist only. Furthermore, we found heterogeneity in preferences for most attributes, indicating that one strategy does not fit all. Individualised follow-up seems to offer the potential for significant increases in patient satisfaction.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial.Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):705-10. Br J Gen Pract. 1999. PMID: 10756611 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patients' needs and preferences in routine follow-up for early breast cancer; an evaluation of the changing role of the nurse practitioner.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;37(9):765-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 20. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21764242
-
Nurse-led telephone follow-up and an educational group programme after breast cancer treatment: results of a 2 × 2 randomised controlled trial.Eur J Cancer. 2011 May;47(7):1027-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 Jan 13. Eur J Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21237636 Clinical Trial.
-
Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer.CMAJ. 1998 Feb 10;158 Suppl 3:S65-70. CMAJ. 1998. PMID: 9484280 Review.
-
[Monitoring of patients with breast cancer after multimodal treatment].Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008 Feb;76(2):107-12. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008. PMID: 18798403 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):553-565. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0235-y. Patient. 2017. PMID: 28364387 Free PMC article.
-
Determining cancer survivors' preferences to inform new models of follow-up care.Br J Cancer. 2016 Dec 6;115(12):1495-1503. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.352. Epub 2016 Nov 1. Br J Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27802453 Free PMC article.
-
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014. PMID: 25005924
-
Acceptability of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists: A qualitative evaluation.Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2441-2452. doi: 10.1111/hex.13846. Epub 2023 Aug 15. Health Expect. 2023. PMID: 37583292 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences of Cancer Survivors for Follow-Up Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Patient. 2025 Mar;18(2):115-129. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00722-6. Epub 2024 Nov 1. Patient. 2025. PMID: 39482547
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical