Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;10(4):802-809.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03020.x. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

Listing for expanded criteria donor kidneys in older adults and those with predicted benefit

Affiliations

Listing for expanded criteria donor kidneys in older adults and those with predicted benefit

M E Grams et al. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Certain patient groups are predicted to derive significant survival benefit from transplantation with expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. An algorithm published in 2005 by Merion and colleagues characterizes this group: older adults, diabetics and registrants at centers with long waiting times. Our goal was to evaluate ECD listing practice patterns in the United States in terms of these characteristics. We reviewed 142 907 first-time deceased donor kidney registrants reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 2003 and 2008. Of registrants predicted to benefit from ECD transplantation according to the Merion algorithm ('ECD-benefit'), 49.8% were listed for ECD offers ('ECD-willing'), with proportions ranging from 0% to 100% by transplant center. In contrast, 67.6% of adults over the age of 65 years were ECD-willing, also ranging from 0% to 100% by center. In multivariate models, neither diabetes nor center waiting time was significantly associated with ECD-willingness in any subgroup. From the time of initial registration, irrespective of eventual transplantation, ECD-willingness was associated with a significant adjusted survival advantage in the ECD-benefit group (HR for death 0.88, p < 0.001) and in older adults (HR 0.89, p < 0.001), but an increased mortality in non-ECD-benefit registrants (HR 1.11, p < 0.001). In conclusion, ECD listing practices are widely varied and not consistent with published recommendations, a pattern that may disenfranchise certain transplant registrants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Variation in transplant center listing in (A) registrants predicted to benefit from ECD kidneys according to the Merion algorithm and (B) registrants aged 65 or over
Shown are distributions, with the X-axis indicating a proportion from 0 to 100% and the Y-axis indicating how many transplant centers listed that proportion of their ECD-benefit or older registrants for ECD kidneys. Bars on the Y-axis are further stratified by center waiting time.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cecka JM, Cohen B, Rosendale J, Smith M. Could more effective use of kidneys recovered from older deceased donors result in more kidney transplants for older patients? Transplantation. 2006;81:966–970. - PubMed
    1. Merion RM. What can we learn from discarded deceased donor kidneys? Transplantation. 2006;81:973. - PubMed
    1. Sung RS, Galloway J, Tuttle-Newhall JE, et al. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(4 Pt 2):922–934. - PubMed
    1. Organ and Transplantation Network: National Data. [Accessed on October 1, 2009]; Available at: http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/latestData/rptStrat.asp.
    1. Sung RS, Christensen LL, Leichtman AB, et al. Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:783–792. - PubMed

Publication types