On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs
- PMID: 20149098
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04554.x
On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs
Abstract
In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the availability of high density genetic marker data for both model and non-model organisms. A potential application of these data is to infer relatedness in the absence of a complete pedigree. Using a marker panel of 771 SNPs genotyped in three generations of an extensive zebra finch pedigree, correlations between pedigree relatedness and seven marker-based estimates of relatedness were examined, as was the relationship between heterozygosity and inbreeding. Although marker-based and pedigree relatedness were highly correlated, the variance in estimated relatedness was high. Further, the correlation between heterozygosity and inbreeding was weak, even though mean inbreeding coefficient is typical of that seen in wild vertebrate pedigrees; the weak relationship was in part due to the small variance in inbreeding in the pedigree. Our data suggest that using marker information to reconstruct the pedigree, and then calculating relatedness from the pedigree, is likely to give more accurate relatedness estimates than using marker-based estimators directly.
Similar articles
-
Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation.Mol Ecol. 2012 Jul;21(13):3237-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05593.x. Epub 2012 May 3. Mol Ecol. 2012. PMID: 22554318
-
How many SNPs are enough?Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr;19(7):1265-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04555.x. Mol Ecol. 2010. PMID: 20456228
-
Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?Theor Popul Biol. 2016 Feb;107:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Sep 3. Theor Popul Biol. 2016. PMID: 26344786
-
Meiotic recombination shapes precision of pedigree- and marker-based estimates of inbreeding.Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Mar;118(3):239-248. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.95. Epub 2016 Nov 2. Heredity (Edinb). 2017. PMID: 27804967 Free PMC article.
-
Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful?Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jan;16(1):33-44. doi: 10.1038/nrg3821. Epub 2014 Nov 18. Nat Rev Genet. 2015. PMID: 25404112 Review.
Cited by
-
Landscape Genetic Connectivity and Evidence for Recombination in the North American Population of the White-Nose Syndrome Pathogen, Pseudogymnoascus destructans.J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Mar 3;7(3):182. doi: 10.3390/jof7030182. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33802538 Free PMC article.
-
How well do genetic markers inform about responses to intraspecific admixture? A comparative analysis of microsatellites and RADseq.BMC Genom Data. 2021 Jun 28;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12863-021-00974-3. BMC Genom Data. 2021. PMID: 34182923 Free PMC article.
-
High-throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 11;111(10):3775-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318945111. Epub 2014 Feb 28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24586051 Free PMC article.
-
Fresh is best: Accurate SNP genotyping from koala scats.Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb 18;8(6):3139-3151. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3765. eCollection 2018 Mar. Ecol Evol. 2018. PMID: 29607013 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of Inbreeding Depression From Overdominant Loci Using Molecular Markers.Evol Appl. 2025 Mar 13;18(3):e70085. doi: 10.1111/eva.70085. eCollection 2025 Mar. Evol Appl. 2025. PMID: 40094104 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources