Could stroma contribute to field cancerization?
- PMID: 20149555
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.01.019
Could stroma contribute to field cancerization?
Abstract
The common oral diseases as well as oral cancer have the characteristic of field cancerization or field effect. Field cancerization, characterized by phenotypic and genetic changes in the neighboring cells of the frank cancer cells, is a clinical phenomenon first found in head and neck cancers. Field cancerization of the epithelia is currently a widely-accepted model in cancer biology as a manifestation of cancer progression. The concomitant changes in the tumor microenvironment have drawn more attention recently. Could the changes in the tumor microenvironment and the epithelial field cancerization concepts be linked? In view of the importance of stroma in the development of epithelium and evidence in carcinoma-associated stroma, we propose the question if stroma not only reciprocates the neoplastic changes of the epithelia, but also contributes to field cancerization. Actually one perspective paper pointed out that healing wound can influence the recurrence of field cancerization. In another words, the microenvironment of healing wound determines the prognosis of field cancerization. Based on the literatures published and our own work, we hypothesize a new model of field cancerization focusing on the co-evolution of the tumor microenvironment. We suggest that the microenvironment cannot be neglected when treating diseases with characteristics of field cancerization.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Marker profiling of normal keratinocytes identifies the stroma from squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity as a modulatory microenvironment in co-culture.Int J Radiat Biol. 2007 Nov-Dec;83(11-12):837-48. doi: 10.1080/09553000701694343. Int J Radiat Biol. 2007. PMID: 17952768
-
Molecular insights into prostate cancer progression: the missing link of tumor microenvironment.J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):10-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000141582.15218.10. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15592017 Review.
-
A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications.Cancer Res. 2003 Apr 15;63(8):1727-30. Cancer Res. 2003. PMID: 12702551 Review.
-
Mammary field cancerization: molecular evidence and clinical importance.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Nov;118(2):229-39. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0504-0. Epub 2009 Aug 15. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009. PMID: 19685287 Review.
-
Gene promoter methylation in prostate tumor-associated stromal cells.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Feb 15;98(4):255-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj051. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16478744
Cited by
-
Leukoplakia and Immunology: New Chemoprevention Landscapes?Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 19;21(18):6874. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186874. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32961682 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spatially resolved optical and ultrastructural properties of colorectal and pancreatic field carcinogenesis observed by inverse spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.J Biomed Opt. 2014 Mar;19(3):36013. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036013. J Biomed Opt. 2014. PMID: 24643530 Free PMC article.
-
Etiologic field effect: reappraisal of the field effect concept in cancer predisposition and progression.Mod Pathol. 2015 Jan;28(1):14-29. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.81. Epub 2014 Jun 13. Mod Pathol. 2015. PMID: 24925058 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biological consequences of cancer radiotherapy in the context of oral squamous cell carcinoma.Head Face Med. 2021 Aug 26;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00286-y. Head Face Med. 2021. PMID: 34446029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microenvironmental genomic alterations reveal signaling networks for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.J Clin Bioinforma. 2011 Aug 2;1(1):21. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-21. J Clin Bioinforma. 2011. PMID: 21884569 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical