Duration and predictors of emergency surgical operations--basis for medical management of mass casualty incidents
- PMID: 20149987
- PMCID: PMC3351939
- DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-12-532
Duration and predictors of emergency surgical operations--basis for medical management of mass casualty incidents
Abstract
Background: Hospitals have a critically important role in the management of mass causality incidents (MCI), yet there is little information to assist emergency planners. A significantly limiting factor of a hospital's capability to treat those affected is its surgical capacity. We therefore intended to provide data about the duration and predictors of life saving operations.
Methods: The data of 20,815 predominantly blunt trauma patients recorded in the Trauma Registry of the German-Trauma-Society was retrospectively analyzed to calculate the duration of life-saving operations as well as their predictors. Inclusion criteria were an ISS≥16 and the performance of relevant ICPM-coded procedures within 6h of admission.
Results: From 1,228 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria 1,793 operations could be identified as life-saving operations. Acute injuries to the abdomen accounted for 54.1% followed by head injuries (26.3%), pelvic injuries (11.5%), thoracic injuries (5.0%) and major amputations (3.1%). The mean cut to suture time was 130min (IQR 65-165min). Logistic regression revealed 8 variables associated with an emergency operation: AIS of abdomen ≥3 (OR 4,00), ISS ≥35 (OR 2,94), hemoglobin level ≤8 mg/dL (OR 1,40), pulse rate on hospital admission <40 or >120/min (OR 1,39), blood pressure on hospital admission <90 mmHg (OR 1,35), prehospital infusion volume ≥2000 ml (OR 1,34), GCS ≤8 (OR 1,32) and anisocoria (OR 1,28) on-scene.
Conclusions: The mean operation time of 130min calculated for emergency life-saving surgical operations provides a realistic guideline for the prospective treatment capacity which can be estimated and projected into an actual incident admission capacity. Knowledge of predictive factors for life-saving emergency operations helps to identify those patients that need most urgent operative treatment in case of blunt MCI.
Similar articles
-
[Estimation of surgical treatment capacity for managing mass casualty incidents based on time needed for life-saving emergency operations].Unfallchirurg. 2006 Apr;109(4):278-84. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1061-1. Unfallchirurg. 2006. PMID: 16541238 German.
-
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020. PMID: 30406394
-
A systematic literature review of criteria and models for casualty distribution in trauma related mass casualty incidents.Injury. 2018 Nov;49(11):1959-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 6. Injury. 2018. PMID: 30220633
-
Patient distribution in a mass casualty event of an airplane crash.Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 May 28. Injury. 2013. PMID: 23725871
-
The development and features of the Spanish prehospital advanced triage method (META) for mass casualty incidents.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Apr 29;24:63. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0255-y. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27130042 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
[Pretreatment mass casualty incident workflow analysis : Comparison of two level 1 trauma centers].Unfallchirurg. 2016 Aug;119(8):632-41. doi: 10.1007/s00113-016-0200-6. Unfallchirurg. 2016. PMID: 27351989 German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical