Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Mar;51(3):360-7.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066217. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET for evaluation of paraaortic nodal metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma: a metaanalysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET for evaluation of paraaortic nodal metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma: a metaanalysis

Sokbom Kang et al. J Nucl Med. 2010 Mar.
Free article

Erratum in

  • J Nucl Med. 2010 Aug;51(8):1327

Abstract

We assessed the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET in detecting paraaortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.

Methods: Through a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (1980 to March 2009), we performed a random-effects meta analysis. A summary receiver-operating-characteristic curve was constructed using hierarchical regression models. To identify other sources of heterogeneity, regression meta analysis was performed.

Results: Patients (n = 385) from 10 studies were analyzed. Although specificity of (18)F-FDG PET was consistent (97%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93%-99%), sensitivity was low and heterogeneous among the studies (34%; 95% CI, 10%-72%). Although regression meta analysis did not identify any source to which heterogeneity could be attributed, it revealed a trend of increasing sensitivity according to an increase in the prevalence of PALN metastasis (P = 0.001). In the 5 studies with prevalence greater than 15%, estimated sensitivity and specificity were 73% (95% CI, 53%-87%) and 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%), respectively. With the diagnostic performance, assuming the prevalence of 15%, the calculated false-positive and -negative rates were 35% and 5%, respectively.

Conclusion: In detecting PALN metastasis, PET performs acceptably only in populations with a relatively high probability of PALN metastasis. Otherwise, we found no evidence to justify the evaluation of PALN based solely on PET in cervical cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances