Bone pain reduction in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with ibandronate-results from a post-marketing surveillance study
- PMID: 20151162
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0749-5
Bone pain reduction in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with ibandronate-results from a post-marketing surveillance study
Abstract
Background: Pain relief is an important treatment goal for breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease and treatment should be associated with a low rate of side effects. This interim analysis of a prospective non-interventional study documents the efficacy and safety of the amino-bisphosphonate ibandronate in the treatment of metastatic bone disease under real-life conditions.
Patients and methods: For up to 24 weeks 913 breast cancer patients received IV infusions of 6 mg ibandronate every 3-4 weeks or 50 mg of oral ibandronate once daily. Efficacy variables included pain severity, analgesic use, and skeletal-related events; the major safety parameter was renal function, assessed by serum creatinine levels. Subgroup analyses were performed according to pretreatment with bisphosphonates (none, ibandronate, or other bisphosphonates).
Results: At baseline, patients with ibandronate pretreatment tended to have lower mean pain scores and lower serum creatinine levels than those pre-treated with other bisphosphonates. Over the observation period, analgesic use did not increase. Among the 712 patients reporting pain at baseline, 70% achieved an improvement in pain severity during treatment with ibandronate, and there was no evidence to suggest relevant differences in mean pain reductions with IV or oral administration of ibandronate or according to prior bisphosphonate treatment. Skeletal-related events were rare (7%). Changes in serum creatinine levels during ibandronate treatment were small and both formulations of ibandronate were rated as well tolerated by physicians and patients.
Conclusions: Data from this non-interventional study confirm the analgesic efficacy and safety profile of IV and oral ibandronate under real-life conditions.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate versus IV zoledronic acid or IV pamidronate for bone metastases in patients receiving oral hormonal therapy for breast cancer in the United Kingdom.Clin Ther. 2005 Aug;27(8):1295-310. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.08.006. Clin Ther. 2005. PMID: 16199254
-
Loading dose ibandronate versus standard oral ibandronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer.Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Apr;15(2):117-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Oct 2. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25454689 Clinical Trial.
-
Ibandronate in metastatic bone pain.Semin Oncol. 2004 Oct;31(5 Suppl 10):67-72. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.07.026. Semin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15490379 Review.
-
Ibandronate: its role in metastatic breast cancer.Oncologist. 2006;11 Suppl 1:27-33. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-90001-27. Oncologist. 2006. PMID: 16971737 Review.
-
Oral ibandronate in metastatic bone breast cancer: the Florence University experience and a review of the literature.J Chemother. 2010 Feb;22(1):58-62. doi: 10.1179/joc.2010.22.1.58. J Chemother. 2010. PMID: 20227995 Review.
Cited by
-
[Influencing fracture healing by specific osteoporosis medications].Z Rheumatol. 2025 Mar;84(2):107-112. doi: 10.1007/s00393-024-01610-y. Epub 2025 Jan 14. Z Rheumatol. 2025. PMID: 39806104 Review. German.
-
Ibandronate: The loading dose concept in the treatment of metastatic bone pain.J Bone Oncol. 2015 Nov 30;5(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2015.11.001. eCollection 2016 Mar. J Bone Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26998420 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting characteristics of cancer pain: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Jan;17(1):57-66. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.78451. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011. PMID: 21633623 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical