Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;17(6):1669-74.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0957-8. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in the management of locally recurrent breast cancer

Affiliations

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in the management of locally recurrent breast cancer

A J Lindford et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate whether skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is a possible treatment option in selected cases of locally recurrent breast cancer after previous breast-conserving therapy (BCT).

Material and methods: Sixty consecutive patients were treated by SSM and IBR between 1995 and 2008 for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR). Selection criteria consisted of: IBTR <3 cm size, not infiltrating skin or chest wall, primarily node negative, recurrence >3 years after primary operation, and no metastases. Patient records were analysed retrospectively and follow-up data on patient outcome included.

Results: The reconstruction method consisted of 40 free abdominal flaps, 18 latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps with or without an implant, and two cases of implant only. Twenty-three patients received adjuvant oncological therapy. During median follow-up of 66 months, 11 patients (18%) developed disease relapse, including 6 (10%) local re-recurrences.

Conclusion: IBR is a possible treatment option for patients who develop local recurrence following earlier BCT. Our local re-recurrence rate of 10% compares well with that following salvage mastectomy for IBTR. Of patients, 43% did not actually meet our selection criteria but yet appeared to fare well in terms of outcome. Therefore we should re-evaluate our selection criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by