Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;159(2):199-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.007.

Anger expression and risk of coronary heart disease: evidence from the Nova Scotia Health Survey

Affiliations

Anger expression and risk of coronary heart disease: evidence from the Nova Scotia Health Survey

Karina W Davidson et al. Am Heart J. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Whereas some studies have found that anger increases the risk of incident coronary heart disease (CHD), others found anger to be protective. Prior studies did not account for different types of anger expression, which may be associated with opposing levels of cardiovascular risk. This study examines whether distinct types of anger expression differentially predict incident CHD.

Methods: We conducted a population-based, observational prospective study of 785 randomly selected Canadian men and women (50% each) aged 46 to 92 years and free of CHD in 1995. Using videotaped interviews, trained coders rated 3 types of anger expression: constructive anger (discussing anger to resolve the situation), destructive anger justification (blaming others for one's anger), and destructive anger rumination (brooding over an anger-inducing incident). The association between anger expression type per SD and incident CHD was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors, depressive symptoms, hostility, and anxiety. Interactions of anger expression type and gender were also tested.

Results: There were 115 incident CHD events (14.6%) during 6,584 person-years of follow-up. The association between clinically assessed constructive anger expression and CHD varied by gender (P for interaction = .02); higher levels were associated with a lower risk of incident CHD in men only (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.80, P < .001), whereas higher levels of destructive anger justification was associated with a 31% increased risk of CHD in both sexes (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.67, P = .03) and predicted CHD incidence independent of covariates and depressive symptoms, hostility, and anxiety.

Conclusions: Decreased constructive anger in men and increased destructive anger justification in men and women are associated with increased risk of 10-year incident CHD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Protective and Harmful Aspects of Anger Expression Dashed line indicates null value Size of square indicates the inverse variance weight

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Suls J, Bunde J. Anger, anxiety, and depression as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the problems and implications of overlapping affective dispositions. Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131(2):260–300. - PubMed
    1. Eng PM, Fitzmaurice G, Kubzansky LD, Rimm EB, Kawachi I. Anger expression and risk of stroke and coronary heart disease among male health professionals. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003;65(1):100–110. - PubMed
    1. Chang PP, Ford DE, Meoni LA, Wang NY, Klag MJ. Anger in young men and subsequent premature cardiovascular disease: The Precursors study. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002;162(8):901–906. - PubMed
    1. Eaker ED, Sullivan LM, Kelly-Hayes M, D’Agostino RB, Sr, Benjamin EJ. Anger and hostility predict the development of atrial fibrillation in men in the Framingham Offspring study. Circulation. 2004;109(10):1267–1271. - PubMed
    1. Myrtek M. Meta-analyses of prospective studies on coronary heart disease, type A personality, and hostility. International Journal of Cardiology. 2001;79(23):245–51. - PubMed

Publication types