Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 15;105(4):511-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.020. Epub 2010 Jan 5.

Effect of right ventricular function and venous congestion on cardiorenal interactions during the treatment of decompensated heart failure

Affiliations

Effect of right ventricular function and venous congestion on cardiorenal interactions during the treatment of decompensated heart failure

Jeffrey M Testani et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Recent reports have demonstrated the adverse effects of venous congestion on renal function (RF) and challenged the assumption that worsening RF is driven by decreased cardiac output (CO). We hypothesized that diuresis in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, despite decreased CO, would lead to a decrease in venous congestion and resultant improvement in RF. We reviewed consecutive admissions with a discharge diagnosis of heart failure. RV function was assessed by multiple echocardiographic methods and those with >or=2 measurements of RV dysfunction were considered to have significant RV dysfunction. Worsening RF was defined as an increase in creatinine of >or=0.3 mg/dl and improved RF as improvement in glomerular filtration rate >or=25%. A total of 141 admissions met eligibility criteria; 34% developed worsening RF. Venous congestion was more common in those with RV dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] 3.3, p = 0.009). All measurements of RV dysfunction excluding RV dilation correlated with CO (p <0.05). Significant RV dysfunction predicted a lower incidence of worsening RF (OR 0.21, p <0.001) and a higher incidence of improved RF (OR 6.4, p <0.001). CO emerged as a significant predictor of change in glomerular filtration rate during hospitalization in those without significant RV dysfunction (r = 0.38, p <0.001). In conclusion, RV dysfunction is a strong predictor of improved renal outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, an effect likely mediated by relief of venous congestion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of improved worsening RF by number of positive measures of RV dysfunction (A) Improved RF, defined as ≥ 25% increase in glomerular filtration rate (B) Worsening renal function, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL. RF=renal function. RV= Right ventricle.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of improved worsening RF by number of positive measures of RV dysfunction (A) Improved RF, defined as ≥ 25% increase in glomerular filtration rate (B) Worsening renal function, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL. RF=renal function. RV= Right ventricle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CO grouped by worsening RF. (A) CO grouped by worsening RF in total cohort. (B) CO grouped by worsening RF and RV dysfunction. No RV dysfunction defined as absence of any RV dysfunction measure correlating with CO (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, or qualitative RV dysfunction). p values represent between group differences. CO =cardiac output. RF=renal function. RV= Right ventricle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CO grouped by worsening RF. (A) CO grouped by worsening RF in total cohort. (B) CO grouped by worsening RF and RV dysfunction. No RV dysfunction defined as absence of any RV dysfunction measure correlating with CO (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, or qualitative RV dysfunction). p values represent between group differences. CO =cardiac output. RF=renal function. RV= Right ventricle.

References

    1. Hosenpud JD, Greenberg BH. Congestive Heart Failure. 3. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 375.
    1. Haddad F, Hunt SA, Rosenthal DN, Murphy DJ. Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part I: Anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circulation. 2008;117:1436–1448. - PubMed
    1. Haddad F, Doyle R, Murphy DJ, Hunt SA. Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part II: pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management of RV failure. Circulation. 2008;117:1717–1731. - PubMed
    1. Kjaergaard J, Akkan D, Iversen KK, Køber L, Torp-Pedersen C, Hassager C. Right ventricular dysfunction as an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9:610–616. - PubMed
    1. Field ME, Solomon SD, Lewis EF, Kramer DB, Baughman KL, Stevenson LW, Tedrow UB. Right ventricular dysfunction and adverse outcome in patients with advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2006;12:616–620. - PubMed

MeSH terms