Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States
- PMID: 20152670
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.023
Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this descriptive study was to use a carefully constructed, pilot-tested survey instrument to identify the most common orthodontic retainers and retention protocols prescribed in the United States as reported by active members of the American Association of Orthodontists.
Methods: We randomly selected 2000 active members, stratified by region of practice, for the study. Information gathered included, but was not limited to, the types of retainers prescribed in the maxillary and mandibular arches, duration of full-time and part-time wear, use of fixed retainers, appliances fabricated in office vs commercial laboratories, the number of debonds per year, and retention appointment schedules. The survey consisted of 20 questions. Data were gathered on a categorical scale and analyzed.
Results: We received 658 responses (32.9%) during a 12-week period. Maxillary Hawley retainers (58.2%) and mandibular fixed lingual retainers (40.2%) were the most commonly used. Most orthodontists prescribed less than 9 months of full-time wear of removable retainers and thereafter advised part-time, but lifetime wear. Most orthodontists (75.9%) did not instruct patients to have the fixed lingual retainers removed at a specific time. More orthodontists who prescribed Hawley retainers recommended longer full-time wear compared with clear thermoplastic retainers. The timing of scheduled retention appointments varied among clinicians and depended on the number of years in practice, the volume of patients debonded, and the type of prescribed retainer. The only regional difference associated with retainer design was the Northeast region, where mandibular fixed lingual retainers were used less frequently. Female orthodontists did not use mandibular fixed lingual retainers as often as their male counterparts.
Conclusions: Maxillary Hawley and mandibular fixed lingual retainers are most commonly used. This study is the first to describe retention protocols and the scheduling of retention appointments in the United States.
Similar articles
-
A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand.Aust Orthod J. 2004 Nov;20(2):99-106. Aust Orthod J. 2004. PMID: 16429880
-
A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands.Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):432-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn131. Epub 2009 Apr 28. Eur J Orthod. 2009. PMID: 19401355
-
Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists.Orthodontics (Chic.). 2013;14(1):e110-7. doi: 10.11607/ortho.964. Orthodontics (Chic.). 2013. PMID: 23646321
-
Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29602341 Review.
-
Performance of Hawley-type retainers: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):115-125. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx036. Eur J Orthod. 2018. PMID: 28549122
Cited by
-
Comparison of speech changes caused by four different orthodontic retainers: a crossover randomized clinical trial.Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Jul 8;29(3):e2423277. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e2423277.oar. eCollection 2024. Dental Press J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 38985077 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Use of Polymers to Enhance Post-Orthodontic Tooth Stability.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Dec 27;15(1):103. doi: 10.3390/polym15010103. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36616453 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: A survey.J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Nov;75(6):446-58. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0239-3. Epub 2014 Oct 26. J Orofac Orthop. 2014. PMID: 25344126
-
What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? - systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.Head Face Med. 2021 Jul 24;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00281-3. Head Face Med. 2021. PMID: 34301280 Free PMC article.
-
A feasible method to improve adherence of Hawley retainer in adolescent orthodontic patients: a randomized controlled trial.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 28;9:1525-30. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S94111. eCollection 2015. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015. PMID: 26604705 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources