Choosing for the child with cochlear implants: a note of precaution
- PMID: 20155398
- DOI: 10.1007/s11019-010-9232-9
Choosing for the child with cochlear implants: a note of precaution
Abstract
Recent contributions to discussions on paediatric cochlear implantation in Norway indicate two mutually exclusive doctrines prescribing the best course of post-operative support for a child with cochlear implants; bilingually with sign language and spoken language simultaneously or primarily monolingually with speech only. This conflict constitutes an ethical problem for parents responsible for choosing between one of the two alternatives. This article puts forth the precautionary principle as a possible solution to this problem. Although scientific uncertainty exists in the case of both doctrines, there exists a scenario of possible irreversible harm to some of the children habilitated monolingually. An application of the precautionary principle may hence suggest that it is rational to agree on the bilingual approach, at least for the time-being.
Similar articles
-
[Bilingualism good].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 May 29;128(11):1301. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008. PMID: 18511978 Norwegian. No abstract available.
-
[Cochlear implants and specific language difficulties].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Jun 12;128(12):1418-9; author reply 1419. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008. PMID: 18552906 Norwegian. No abstract available.
-
Receptive and productive speech and language abilities in hearing-impaired children with German as a second language.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;120:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30772612
-
[Through Cochlear Implant to CODA? - Cochlear Implantation in Children with Deaf or Severely Hearing-impaired Parents: Conditions, Problems, Results].Laryngorhinootologie. 2018 Mar;97(3):176-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-100741. Epub 2018 Mar 1. Laryngorhinootologie. 2018. PMID: 29495042 Review. German.
-
Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation.Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:50-65. doi: 10.1159/000094644. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16891836 Review.
Cited by
-
Bioethics and medical/legal considerations on cochlear implants in children.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;78(3):70-9. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942012000300013. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 22714850 Free PMC article.
-
Saving Deaf Children? Screening for Hearing loss as a Public-interest Case.J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):109-121. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9752-y. Epub 2016 Oct 19. J Bioeth Inq. 2017. PMID: 27761875
-
Cochlear Implant: the complexity involved in the decision making process by the family.Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 May-Jun;22(3):415-24. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.3044.2432. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014. PMID: 25029052 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancement technology and outcomes: what professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants.Health Care Anal. 2012 Dec;20(4):367-84. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0225-0. Health Care Anal. 2012. PMID: 22976285
-
Writing Development in DHH Students: A Bimodal Bilingual Approach.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2023 Mar 24;28(2):211-225. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enac045. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2023. PMID: 36964761 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources