Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;98(1):37-43.
doi: 10.1007/s10266-009-0109-4. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

Bond strength of adhesives to dentin contaminated with smoker's saliva

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Bond strength of adhesives to dentin contaminated with smoker's saliva

Lilliam M Pinzon et al. Odontology. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of contamination with smoker's and non-smoker's saliva on the bond strength of resin composite to superficial dentin using different adhesive systems. The interfacial structure between the resin and dentin was evaluated for each treatment using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Freshly extracted human molars were ground with 600-grit SiC paper to expose the superficial dentin. Adhesives [One-Up-Bond-F-Plus (OUFP) and Adper-Prompt-L-Pop (APLP)] and resin composite (TPHSpectrum) were bonded to the dentin (n = 8/group, 180 total specimens) under five surface conditions: control (adhesive applied following manufacturers' instructions); saliva, then 5-s air dry, then adhesive; adhesive, saliva, 5-s air dry; adhesive, saliva, 5-s water rinse, 5-s air dry (ASW group); and adhesive, saliva, 5-s water rinse, 5-s air dry, reapply adhesive (ASWA group). After storage in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, the specimens were debonded under tension at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. ESEM photomicrographs of the dentin/adhesive interfaces were taken. Mean bond strength ranged from 8.1 to 24.1 MPa. Fisher's protected least significant difference (P = 0.05) intervals for critical adhesive, saliva, and surface condition differences were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.1 MPa, respectively. There were no significant differences in bond strength to dentin between contamination by smoker's and nonsmoker's saliva, but bond strengths were significantly different between adhesive systems, with OUFP twice as strong as APLP under almost all conditions. After adhesive application and contamination with either smoker's or nonsmoker's saliva followed by washing and reapplication of the adhesive (ASWA group), the bond strength of both adhesive systems was the same as that of the control group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
One Up Bond F Plus (OUFP) control group fracture, 5000× magnification
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adper Prompt L Pop (APLP) control group fracture, 5000× magnification
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
OUFP/nonsmoker’s saliva/water/air/OUFP (ASWA) treatment, 5000 × magnification
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
APLP with ASWA treatment, 5000× magnification
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
OUFP with ASWA treatment, 2500× magnification
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
APLP with ASWA treatment, 2500× magnification

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Powers JM, O’Keefe KL, Pinzon LM. Factors affecting in vitro bond strength of bonding agents to human dentin. Odontology. 2003;91:1–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thornton DJ, Davies JR, Carlstedt I, Sheehan JK. In: In air way mucus: basic mechanisms and clinical perspectives. Rogers DF, Lethem MI, editors. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser; 1997. pp. 41–66.
    1. Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ, Jr, Heymann HO, Sigurdsson A. Effects of saliva contamination of resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2004;20:37–44. - PubMed
    1. Ellison SA. Handbook of physiology, section 6, alimentary canal. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1967. Proteins and glycoproteins of saliva.
    1. Gupta R, Jentoft N, Jamieson AM, Blackwell J. Structural analysis of purified human tracheobronchial mucins. Biopoly. 1990;29:347–55. - PubMed

Publication types