Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;14(1):67-73.
doi: 10.1080/13607860902845574.

The impact of past and present preferences on stimulus engagement in nursing home residents with dementia

Jiska Cohen-Mansfield  1 , Marcia S Marx, Khin Thein, Maha Dakheel-Ali
Affiliations

The impact of past and present preferences on stimulus engagement in nursing home residents with dementia

Jiska Cohen-Mansfield et al. Aging Ment Health. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined engagement with stimuli in 193 nursing home residents with dementia. We hypothesized that activities and stimuli based on a person's past and current preferences would result in more engagement than other activities/stimuli.

Method: The expanded version of the self-identity questionnaire [Cohen-Mansfield, J., Golander, H. & Arheim, G. (2000)] was used to determine participants' past/present interests (as reported by relatives) in the following areas: art, music, babies, pets, reading, television, and office work. We utilized the observational measurement of engagement (Cohen-Mansfield, J., Dakheel-Ali, M., & Marx, M.S. (2009).

Results: Analysis revealed that residents with current interests in music, art, and pets were more engaged by stimuli that reflect these interests than residents without these interests.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the utility of determining a person's preferences for stimuli in order to predict responsiveness. Lack of prediction for some stimuli may reflect differences between past preferences and activities that are feasible in the present.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Algase D, Beck C, Kolanowski A, Whall A, Berent S, Richards K, et al. Need-driven dementia-compromised behavior: An alternative view of disruptive behavior. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 1996;11(6):10–9.
    1. Burgio LD, Scilley K, Hardin JM, Janosky J, Bonino P, Slater SC, et al. Studying disruptive vocalization and contextual factors in the nursing home using computer-assisted real-time observation. Journal of Gerontology:Psychological Sciences. 1994;49(5):230–239. - PubMed
    1. Churchill M, Safaoui J, McCabe BW, Baun MM. Using a therapy dog to alleviate the agitation and desocialization of people with Alzheimer's disease. Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 1999;37(4):16–22. - PubMed
    1. Cohen-Mansfield J, Dakheel-Ali M, Marx MS. Engagement in persons with dementia: The concept and its measurement. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2009;17(4):299–307. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen-Mansfield J, Golander H, Arnheim G. Self-identity in older persons suffering from dementia: Preliminary results. Social Science & Medicine. 2000;51:381–394. - PubMed

Publication types