Measuring empathy in couples: validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for couples
- PMID: 20155564
- DOI: 10.1080/00223890903510399
Measuring empathy in couples: validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for couples
Abstract
This article includes three studies aimed at adapting the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1980), a measure of general cognitive and emotional empathy, to assess empathy expressed within a romantic relationship. We examined the factorial structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples (IRIC). Results supported the use of the 2-factor measure (Dyadic Perspective Taking and Dyadic Empathic Concern) in 3 independent samples (individuals in heterosexual relationships, individuals in same-sex relationships, and partners of heterosexual couples). The IRIC also demonstrated good convergent, discriminant, concurrent, predictive, and incremental validity as well as adequate internal consistency and stability over 18 months.
Similar articles
-
Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS).Psychol Assess. 2009 Jun;21(2):194-209. doi: 10.1037/a0016068. Psychol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19485674
-
Dyadic coping in Latino couples: validity of the Spanish version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory.Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013;26(4):447-66. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2012.699045. Epub 2012 Jul 10. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013. PMID: 22780200
-
Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples.Dev Psychol. 2008 Jan;44(1):102-16. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.102. Dev Psychol. 2008. PMID: 18194009
-
The case for mindfulness-based approaches in the cultivation of empathy: does nonjudgmental, present-moment awareness increase capacity for perspective-taking and empathic concern?J Marital Fam Ther. 2007 Oct;33(4):501-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00034.x. J Marital Fam Ther. 2007. PMID: 17935532 Review.
-
Dyadic splitting in partner relational disorders.J Fam Psychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):418-22. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.418. J Fam Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16937998 Review.
Cited by
-
Measuring adult romantic attachment: psychometric properties of the brief Spanish version of the experiences in close relationships.Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Jun 5;33(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00145-w. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020. PMID: 32542456 Free PMC article.
-
Sex-Specific Effect of Recalled Parenting on Affective and Cognitive Empathy in Adulthood.Curr Psychol. 2017;36(2):236-241. doi: 10.1007/s12144-015-9405-z. Epub 2016 Jan 18. Curr Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28725136 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Compersion: A Study on Polish Consensually Non-Monogamous Individuals and Adaptation of the COMPERSe Questionnaire.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Aug;53(8):3285-3307. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02930-5. Epub 2024 Jul 1. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38951409 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer-related effects on relationships, long-term psychological status and relationship satisfaction in couples whose child was treated for leukemia: A PETALE study.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203435. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30192798 Free PMC article.
-
Using resting-state DMN effective connectivity to characterize the neurofunctional architecture of empathy.Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38801-6. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30796260 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical