Maintaining vascular access: the management of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts
- PMID: 20155717
- DOI: 10.1177/112972981001100202
Maintaining vascular access: the management of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts
Abstract
For the nephrologist and surgeon, maintaining vascular access is a significant challenge in hemodialysis (HD), because the portal is vulnerable to infection, stenosis, and thrombus. Vascular access options for HD include the placement of arteriovenous (AV) fistulas, AV grafts, and double-lumen, cuffed central vein catheters. Catheter use is generally associated with higher rates of infection and could compromise the adequacy of HD. Primary AV fistulas, which are generally recommended and provide excellent HD access, are not always the ideal choice for certain patients, such as the elderly or patients with diabetes mellitus. AV grafts allow for a large surface area available for cannulation, and thrombosed grafts have longer patency rates after revision than do revised fistulas. Although both AV fistulas and AV grafts are vulnerable to thrombosis and/or stenosis, surveillance and techniques such as Doppler ultrasound and intravascular ultrasound can minimize such complications. In addition, pharmacotherapeutic options are being studied to determine whether these complications can be prevented. Studies using a variety of pharmacologic agents have been conducted to determine whether stenosis and graft thrombosis can be prevented and have produced varying results. The use of warfarin can result in significant bleeding, but agents such as fish oil and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have shown some effect in increasing the patency in AV grafts and fistulas. Additional randomized trials with at least 1 or 2 yrs of follow-up are necessary to assess the long-term use of these pharmacotherapies.
Similar articles
-
The CARI guidelines. Pharmacological approaches to preventing vascular access failure.Nephrology (Carlton). 2008 Jul;13 Suppl 2:S12-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.00993.x. Nephrology (Carlton). 2008. PMID: 18713119 Review. No abstract available.
-
Clinical effectiveness of open thrombectomy for thrombosed autogenous arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.050. Epub 2018 Mar 8. J Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29526376
-
Utilization, patency, and complications associated with vascular access for hemodialysis in the United States.J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1166-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.049. J Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 30244924
-
Prosthetic arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis.J Vasc Access. 2009 Jul-Sep;10(3):137-47. doi: 10.1177/112972980901000301. J Vasc Access. 2009. PMID: 19670164 Review.
-
Upper limb grafts for hemodialysis access.J Vasc Access. 2015;16 Suppl 9:S34-9. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000367. Epub 2015 Mar 8. J Vasc Access. 2015. PMID: 25751548 Review.
Cited by
-
Immediate access arteriovenous grafts versus tunnelled central venous catheters: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2015 Feb 8;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0556-x. Trials. 2015. PMID: 25885054 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Most important chronic complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis.Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(3):220-8. doi: 10.1159/000343669. Epub 2012 Nov 2. Med Princ Pract. 2013. PMID: 23128647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality indicators of vascular access procedures for hemodialysis.Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Mar;53(3):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02609-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 32869172 Review.
-
Vascular access today.World J Nephrol. 2012 Jun 6;1(3):69-78. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v1.i3.69. World J Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 24175244 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of the time to intervention on the outcome of thrombosed dialysis access grafts managed percutaneously.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;20(2):143-6. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.13296. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24356296 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical