Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr;95(4):1681-9.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1913. Epub 2010 Feb 15.

Effects of sex, race, and puberty on cortical bone and the functional muscle bone unit in children, adolescents, and young adults

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of sex, race, and puberty on cortical bone and the functional muscle bone unit in children, adolescents, and young adults

Mary B Leonard et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Context: Sex and race differences in bone development are associated with differences in growth, maturation, and body composition.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the independent effects of sex, race, and puberty on cortical bone development and muscle-bone relations in children and young adults.

Design and participants: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 665 healthy participants (310 male, 306 black) ages 5-35 yr.

Outcomes: Tibia peripheral quantitative computed tomography measures were made of cortical bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), periosteal (Peri) and endosteal circumferences, section modulus (Zp), and muscle area. Regression models were adjusted for tibia length, age, race, sex, and Tanner stage.

Results: All cortical measures were greater in blacks than whites (all P < or = 0.001) in Tanner stages 1-4; however, differences in BMC, Peri, and Zp were negligible in Tanner stage 5 (all interactions, P < 0.01). Cortical BMC, Peri, and Zp were lower in females than males in all Tanner stages (all P < 0.001), and the sex differences in Peri and Zp were greater in Tanner stage 5 (interaction, P < 0.02). Cortical BMD was greater (P < 0.0001) and endosteal circumference was lower (P < 0.01) in Tanner 3-5 females, compared with males. Adjustment for muscle area attenuated but did not eliminate sex and race differences in cortical dimensions. Associations between muscle and bone outcomes did not differ according to sex or race.

Conclusion: Sex and race were associated with maturation-specific differences in cortical BMD and dimensions that were not fully explained by differences in bone length or muscle. No race or sex differences in the functional muscle bone unit were identified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sex and race differences in Zp according to age. A, Unadjusted results comparing whites (open circles) and blacks (filled circles). B, Unadjusted results comparing males (open circles) and females (filled circles). C, Race differences in the predicated values for Zp relative to age based on the model in Table 2, comparing whites (open circles) and blacks (closed circles). D, Sex differences in the predicated values for Zp relative to age based on the model in Table 2, comparing males (open circles) and females (closed circles). All 655 participants are included in each panel.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sex and race differences in cortical BMD according to age. A, Unadjusted results comparing whites (open circles) and blacks (filled circles). B, Unadjusted results comparing males (open circles) and females (filled circles). C, Race differences in the predicated values for cortical BMD relative to age based on the model in Table 3, comparing whites (open circles) and blacks (closed circles). D, Sex differences in the predicated values for cortical BMD relative to age based on the model in Table 3, comparing males (open circles) and females (closed circles). All 655 participants are included in each panel.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duan Y, Beck TJ, Wang XF, Seeman E 2003 Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging. J Bone Miner Res 18:1766–1774 - PubMed
    1. Seeman E 2008 Structural basis of growth-related gain and age-related loss of bone strength. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47(Suppl 4):iv2–iv8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seeman E 2002 Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men. Lancet 359:1841–1850 - PubMed
    1. Baron JA, Barrett J, Malenka D, Fisher E, Kniffin W, Bubolz T, Tosteson T 1994 Racial differences in fracture risk. Epidemiology 5:42–47 - PubMed
    1. Rauch F, Schoenau E 2001 The developing bone: slave or master of its cells and molecules? Pediatr Res 50:309–314 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms