Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov 17;1(11):887-902.
doi: 10.18632/aging.100081.

Ionizing radiation and aging: rejuvenating an old idea

Affiliations
Review

Ionizing radiation and aging: rejuvenating an old idea

Richard B Richardson. Aging (Albany NY). .

Abstract

This paper reviews the contemporary evidence that radiation can accelerate aging, degenerative health effects and mortality. Around the 1960s, the idea that ionizing radiation caused premature aging was dismissed as the radiation-induced health effects appeared to be virtually confined to neoplasms. More recently, radiation has become associated with a much wider spectrum of age-related diseases, including cardiovascular disease; although some diseases of old age, such as diabetes, are notably absent as a radiation risk. On the basis of recent research, is there a stronger case today to be made linking radiation and aging? Comparison is made between the now-known biological mechanisms of aging and those of radiation, including oxidative stress, chromosomal damage, apoptosis, stem cell exhaustion and inflammation. The association between radiation effects and the free-radical theory of aging as the causative hypothesis seems to be more compelling than that between radiation and the nutrient-sensing TOR pathway. Premature aging has been assessed by biomarkers in calorie restriction studies; yet, biomarkers such as telomere erosion and p16(INK4a) are ambiguous for radiation-induced aging. Some animal studies suggest low dose radiation may even demonstrate hormesis health benefits. Regardless, there is virtually no support for a life span extending hypothesis for A-bomb survivors and other exposed subjects.

Keywords: aging; and radiation; cancer; life span; oxidative stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Henshaw PS, Riley ER, Stapleton GE. The biological effects of pile. Radiology. 1947;49:349–364. - PubMed
    1. Mewissen DJ, Comar CL, Trum BF, Rust JH. A formula for chronic radiation dosage versus shortening of life span: application to a large mammal. Radiat Res. 1957;6:450–459. - PubMed
    1. Upton AC, Kimball AW, Furth J, Christenberry KW, Benedict WH. Some delayed effects of atom-bomb radiations in mice. Cancer Res. 1960;20:1–60. - PubMed
    1. Strehler BL. Origin and comparison of the effects of time and high-energy radiations on living systems. Q Rev Biol. 1989;34:117–142. - PubMed
    1. Finch SC, Beebe GW. Review of thirty years study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors. II. Biological effects. F. Aging. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 16 Suppl: 108-121; 1975. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources