Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices
- PMID: 20157719
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1374-8
Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the predisposing factors, diagnosis and surgical treatment options of patients with intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices (IUDs).
Methods: The diagnosis and management of 18 patients with intra-abdominal, mislocated IUDs were analyzed in this retrospective study.
Results: Trained midwives inserted ten (55%) of the IUDs, while six (33%) were inserted by general practitioners and two (11%) by specialist gynecologists. Ten (55.5%) of the patients were diagnosed by gynecological examination and ultrasonography (USG); abdominal X-ray, in addition, was required in the other eight (44.4%). Eleven patients (61%) were managed by laparoscopy, whereas laparotomy was required in seven (39%). For all patients, laparoscopy was performed initially. No complication was encountered in any of the patients.
Conclusion: Persons who insert IUDs should receive adequate training before certification, because inadequate pelvic examination before insertion and inexperience of the inserting person might be predisposing factors for uterine perforation. If IUD strings are not visible during gynecologic examination, USG should be tried to locate the IUD and pelvic X-ray used only when USG fails to locate the IUD. Laparoscopy can be the first choice for removal.
Similar articles
-
Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine device by laparoscopy.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002 Mar;7(1):20-3. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002. PMID: 12041860
-
Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory?Contraception. 2002 Aug;66(2):105-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00327-x. Contraception. 2002. PMID: 12204783
-
[Extrauterine mislocated IUD].Ginekol Pol. 2009 Dec;80(12):942-5. Ginekol Pol. 2009. PMID: 20120941 Polish.
-
[The 'lost' intra-uterine contraceptive device (author's transl)].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1981;10(5):473-8. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1981. PMID: 7033343 Review. French.
-
Ovarian embedding of a transmigrated intrauterine device: a case report and literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Aug;280(2):275-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0882-2. Epub 2008 Dec 19. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 19096860 Review.
Cited by
-
Intrauterine device found in an ovarian tumor: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22825. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022825. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33080762 Free PMC article.
-
Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal.JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):236-41. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982377265. JSLS. 2012. PMID: 23477171 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical characteristic and intraoperative findings of uterine perforation patients in using of intrauterine devices (IUDs).Gynecol Surg. 2018;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1032-2. Epub 2018 Jan 16. Gynecol Surg. 2018. PMID: 29386988 Free PMC article.
-
An innovative method of retrieval of the broken suction cannula tip during medical termination of pregnancy using a fibrobronchoscope during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Jul;77(Suppl 2):S499-S501. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.10.016. Epub 2021 Feb 23. Med J Armed Forces India. 2021. PMID: 33642667 Free PMC article.
-
Asymptomatic uterine perforation and IUD migration to the broad ligament: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 16;103(7):e33857. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033857. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38363896 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources