Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 16;52(1):14.
doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-14.

Housing system and herd size interactions in Norwegian dairy herds; associations with performance and disease incidence

Affiliations

Housing system and herd size interactions in Norwegian dairy herds; associations with performance and disease incidence

Egil Simensen et al. Acta Vet Scand. .

Abstract

Background: According to the Norwegian animal welfare regulations, it has been forbidden to build new tie-stall barns since the end of 2004. Previous studies have shown that cow performance and health differ between housing systems. The interaction between housing system and herd size with respect to performance and disease incidence has not been evaluated.

Methods: Cow performance and health in 620 herds housed in free-stall barns were compared with in 192 herds housed in tie-stall barns based on a mail survey and data from the Norwegian Dairy Herd Recording and Cattle Health Systems. The housing systems herds were comparable with respect to herd size (15-55 cows). Associations between performance/disease incidence and housing system, herd size and year of building the cow barn were tested in general linear models, and values for fixed herd size of 20 and 50 cows were calculated. On the individual cow level mixed models were run to test the effect of among others housing system and herd size on test-day milk yield, and to evaluate lactation curves in different parities. All cows were of the Norwegian Red Breed.

Results: Average milk production per cow-year was 134 kg lower in free-stall herd than in tie-stall herds, but in the range 27-45 cows there was no significant difference in yields between the herd categories. In herds with less than 27 cows there were increasingly lower yields in free-stalls, particularly in first parity, whereas the yields were increasingly higher in free-stalls with more than 45 cows.In free-stalls fertility was better, calving interval shorter, and the incidence rate of teat injuries, ketosis, indigestions, anoestrus and cystic ovaries was lower than in tie-stalls. All of these factors were more favourable in estimated 50-cow herds as compared to 20-cow herds. In the larger herd category, bulk milk somatic cell counts were higher, and the incidence rate of mastitis (all cases) and all diseases was lower.

Conclusion: This study has shown that there is an interaction between housing system and herd size, and that performance and health is not universally better in small free-stalls than in tie-stalls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of 620 free-stall and 192 tie-stall herds with respect to herd size (no. of cow-years) and building year of cow barn (building or last renovation). Black bars indicate free-stalls and white bars indicate tie-stalls.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expected least squares means from model estimates (Table 1) at a herd size of 20 and 50 cows in 620 free-stall and 192 tie-stall herds. Black bars indicate free-stalls and white bars indicate tie-stalls.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expected incidence rates from model estimates (Table 2) at a herd size of 20 and 50 cows in 620 free-stall and 192 tie-stall herd. Black bars indicate free-stalls and white bars indicate tie-stalls.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Herd milk yields per cow-year and their 95% confidence intervals in 620 free-stall 192 tie-stalls related to herd size out from the general linear models as shown in Table 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Lactation curves for cows in parity 1 and 3 from model estimates (Table 4) in 662 free-stall and 192 tie-stall herds.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scientific Option of the Panel on Animal Health and welfare on request from European Commission on welfare of dairy cows. The EFSA Journ. 2009;1143:1–38.
    1. Valde JP, Hird DW, Thurmond MC, Østerås O. Comparison of ketosis, clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, and reproductive performance between free stall and tie stall barns in Norwegian dairy herds with automatic feeding. Acta Vet Scand. 1997;38:181–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakken G, Røn I, Østerås O. Clinical disease in dairy cows in relation to housing systems. Proceedings VIth Int Congress on Animal Hygiene: 14-17 June 1988; Skara. 1988. pp. 18–22.
    1. Østerås O. Sykdomsforekomst hos kyr i båsfjøs og løsdriftsfjøs (Disease incidence in cows in tie-stalls and free-stalls) Husdyrforsøksmøtet 1990; Ås. Aktuelt fra Statens fagtjeneste for landbruket nr. 4. 1990. pp. 232–237.
    1. Hovinen M, Rasmussen MD, Pÿrälä S. Udder health of cows changing from tie stalls to free stalls with conventional milking to free stalls either with connventional or automatic milking. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3696–3703. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1962. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources