Similar articles

• Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.

  Algase DL. Algase DL. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(4):219-21. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008. PMID: 19093658 No abstract available.
• [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].

  Clarke SP. Clarke SP. Perspect Infirm. 2006 Jan-Feb;3(3):35-9. Perspect Infirm. 2006. PMID: 16480058 French. No abstract available.
• When R & R is not rest & recovery but revise & resubmit.

  Bearinger LH, Taliaferro L, Given B. Bearinger LH, et al. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Oct;33(5):381-5. doi: 10.1002/nur.20398. Res Nurs Health. 2010. PMID: 20827742 No abstract available.
• Writing for publication: a practical guide.

  Happell B. Happell B. Nurs Stand. 2008 Mar 19-25;22(28):35-40. doi: 10.7748/ns2008.03.22.28.35.c6435. Nurs Stand. 2008. PMID: 18429456 Review.
• Simplifying the process of research review for the novice researcher.

  Callihan D. Callihan D. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;35(1):30-3. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000308616.56013.5f. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18199936 Review. No abstract available.