Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 1;20(1):93-104.
doi: 10.1007/s12110-009-9056-6.

Partner Status Influences Women's Interest in the Opposite Sex

Heather Rupp  1 , Giliah R Librach, Nick C Feipel, Ellen D Ketterson, Dale R Sengelaub, Julia R Heiman
Affiliations

Partner Status Influences Women's Interest in the Opposite Sex

Heather Rupp et al. Hum Nat. .

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that hormones, relationship goals, and social context influence interest in the opposite sex. It has not been previously reported, however, whether having a current sexual partner also influences interest in members of the opposite sex. To test this, we obtained explicit and implicit measures of interest by measuring men's and women's subjective ratings and response times while they evaluated photos of opposite-sex faces. Fifty-nine men and 56 women rated 510 photos of opposite-sex faces for realism, masculinity, attractiveness, or affect. We found that these subjective ratings were not influenced by partner status in either men or women. However, women who did not report having a current sexual partner spent more time evaluating the photos than women who did have partners, demonstrating greater interest in the photos. Sexual partner status did not predict men's response times. These findings may reveal that relationship commitment in women suppresses interest in alternative partners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean response times (seconds) collapsed across all ratings by sexual partner status for male and female participants. * denotes a significant difference within females between groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatterplot of women’s mean subjective evaluations of attractiveness (x-axis) with their mean response times (y-axis). Response times and ratings were significantly correlated (r = 0.44, p = 0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bateson M, Healy SD. Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2005;20:659–664. - PubMed
    1. Brown M. Viewing time of pornography. Journal of Psychology. 1979;102:83–95.
    1. Conaglen HM, Evans IM. Pictorial cues and sexual desire: An experimental approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2006;35:197–212. - PubMed
    1. Field M, Mogg K, Zetteler J, Bradley BP. Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: The roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology. 2004;176:88–93. - PubMed
    1. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000;23:573–644. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources